跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/06/088045
CTRI/2025/06/088045尚未招募4 期

To study and compare analgesic efficacy and safety of Ultrasound guided Transforaminal cervical nerve root block (CNRB) versus High Thoracic erector spinae plane block ( ESPB) in patients with lower cervical pain : A prospective randomized controlled study

Palvi1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2025年6月15日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of cervical nerve root block (CNRB) vs High thoracic ESPB in patients with lower cervical pain

研究概览

简要总结

It will be a prospective, randomized, controlled study to study the analgesic efficacy and safety for cervical nerve root block (CNRB) vs high thoracic erector spinae block in patients with lower cervical pain. The participants will be allocated in two groups (Group-C and Group-E) by a computer-generated random sequence number method based on their medical history, physical examination, MRI/CT scans. A single anesthesiologist who specializes in interventional pain management and is familiar with US guided pain procedures will determine the level of block to be given and will perform the procedure. Fifty patients in age group 18-70 with BMI between 18-35 with pre- procedural Visual analogue scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) scores evaluated will be included in this study after obtaining informed consent.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients with upper extremity pain with or without neck pain.
  • Duration of pain more than 6 weeks not responding to conservative treatment(pharmacological) 3)Patient with cervical radicular pain from C5-T1 level pathology on MRI.
  • 18-70 years of either gender 5)BMI between 18-35.

排除标准

  • Patient refusal for consent.
  • Patients with bleeding disorders, deranged coagulation profile.
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the local anesthetics and study drugs.
  • Past history of cervical fractures or injury.
  • Patients with history of CVA with or without neurological deficit.
  • Patients with primary or metastatic malignancy.
  • Previous history of lower cervical spine surgery.
  • Congenital gross spinal deformity.
  • Pregnant females.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of cervical nerve root block (CNRB) vs High thoracic ESPB in patients with lower cervical pain

时间窗: Intraprocedural assessment -At 0 minute, after 5 minutes of starting the procedure followed by 10 min assessment and then 30 min post procedure assessment for any drug related side effects or any procedural side effects also assessing for pain relief | Post procedural | Assessment via VAS and NDI score for pain relief at 1st week ,2nd week ,6th week, 8th week after the procedure by telephonically contacting the patients

次要结局

  • 1.To assess the decrease in pain by VAS & NDI before the procedure & after(the procedure at 1-week, 2-week, 6-week, 8 weeks.)

研究者

发起方
Palvi
申办方类型
Other [self]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Palvi

Department of Anesthesia Dr Rajender Prasad Government medical college Tanda Kangra Himachal Pradesh

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验