跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03141528
NCT03141528已完成不适用

Self-learning Versus Instructor-led Learning in Basic Life Support Training - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 240 人开始时间: 2017年2月9日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
240
试验地点
1
主要终点
Percentage of Correct Compressions

研究概览

简要总结

This study investigates whether there is a difference in the BLS skills in first year medical students directly after training and three months later, when randomly assigned to self-learning versus instructor-led training courses.

详细描述

This is a randomized controlled trial investigating whether self-learning versus instructor-led learning results in the same BLS skills in first year medical students directly after training and three months later.

When participants attend the "Erweiterte Erste Hilfe für Studierende der Humanmedizin" they will receive a short introduction about the study. The investigators will invite all first year students to participate in the study. As the study is voluntarily, participants need to sign a written informed consent. After that, the investigators will randomize the students to either group A or Group B. Group A will train their technical CPR-skills with supervision by a tutor (either general practitioner or medical student, all trained in CPR teaching) and group B will train without supervision. The participants in group B will not be allowed to communicate with each other during the training and they will be prevented from watching each other. The training will take about 30 minutes for each group. Directly after the training each group will be tested and the printed report form from the Laerdal Skill Reporter will be obtained for each participant. In the test the students will perform CPR in a simulated scenario as a first responder. The scenario is: "A male person has collapsed at the railway station." The participant should start CPR as learned in the training. During the CPR a departmental research fellow will observe the study participants and record BLS/AED actions on a scoring sheet.

The investigators will record three cycles of two minutes CPR (with five times 30:2 compression : ventilation intervals, as recommended by the current international resuscitation guidelines). During the three cycles an AED will be delivered and the study participant has to apply the AED and deliver a shock - after three cycles the study terminates.

After the BLS/AED competence testing, both groups will continue the rest of their first aid course together and the first part of the study ends. Three months later, the investigators will repeat the same scenario over the same time interval and record the same parameters. At the end of the second testing, a short feedback will be provided on the BLS/AED competence and further practice will be provided to the students to improve their CPR competence. From this point forward no further data will be collected.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Basic Science
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •First year medical students at the University of Bern participating in the course "Erweiterte Erste Hilfe für Studierende der Humanmedizin" with written informed consent.

排除标准

  • •Students with professional BLS-experience, unable to perform BLS, or missing informed consent will be excluded.

研究组 & 干预措施

Instructor-led learning

Active Comparator

This group will train their technical CPR-skills with supervision by a tutor (either general practitioner or medical student, all trained in CPR teaching)

干预措施: Instructor-led learning (Other)

Self-learning

Experimental

This group will Train alone without supervision and without communicating with the other participants.

干预措施: Self-learning (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Percentage of Correct Compressions

时间窗: after first BLS course and 3 months later

The percentage of correct compressions obtained from the printed report from the Laerdal Skill Reporter.

次要结局

  • False Hand Placement During Compressions(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Assessment of the Teaching Method(after first BLS course)
  • Time From Start of Test Till Call for Help(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Time From Start of Test Till First Ventilation(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Self-assessment of the Participants BLS Competences Before Test(before first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Average Ventilation Volume(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Number of Participants Using Correct Ratio of Compressions:Ventilations(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Compression Depth(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Compressions Too Shallow(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Incomplete Decompression(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Time From Start of Test Till First Compression(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Time From Start of Test Till First Shock(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Assessment of the Participants BLS Competences After Test(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Number of Ventilations Per Minute(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Percentage of Correct Ventilations(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Number of Compressions Per Minute(after first BLS course and 3 months later)
  • Compression Frequency(after first BLS course and 3 months later)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验