Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate vs. Entecavir in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Partial Virologic Response to Entecavir

Phase 4

Completed

• Conditions: Chronic Hepatitis B
• Interventions: Drug: entecavir; Drug: tenofovir

• Registration Number: NCT01711567
• Lead Sponsor: Korea University

Brief Summary

Entecavir, a potent antiviral agent, has been widely used for treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients. However, about 20% of patients showed partial virologic response after 2 year of entecavir therapy (33% in HBeAg positive, 10% in HBeAg negative patients). Tenofovir is a nucleotide analogue with more potent antiviral activity. In addition, there is no cross resistance between the two drugs. Therefore it is assumed that tenofovir would be effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients who shows partial virologic response (detectable HBV DNA by real time PCR after 12 months of treatment) despite treatment with entecavir. In this study, we will compare the efficacy of switching to tenofovir with continuing entecavir in patients who shows partial virologic response to entecavir.

Detailed Description

The number of patients needed was calculated using PASS 2008. We hypothesized that two-thirds (65%) of the patients receiving TDF, and one-fifth (20%) of the patients receiving ETV, would achieve virologic response. We also assumed a 15% drop-out rate; thus, 22 patients were needed in each group to achieve 80% power to demonstrate a difference between the groups with a 5% level of significance.

The primary efficacy end point will be analyzed on a per-protocol basis, including only those patients who had completed the treatment schedule of study. In contrast, the intention-to-treat analysis will include all randomized subjects, even those dropped-out from the study before 12 months, as cases of treatment failure.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2012-10-17
• Study First Submitted QC: 2012-10-18
• Study First Posted: 2012-10-22
• Study Start: 2013-04
• Primary Completion: 2015-12
• Status Verified: 2016-11
• Study Completion: 2016-11
• Last Update Submitted: 2016-11-08
• Last Update Posted: 2016-11-09

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

1. CHB patients (positive HBsAg more than 6 months)
2. Age 19 years old
3. HBeAg positive or negative patients
4. Patients receiving entecavir 0.5 mg more than 12 months
5. Detectable HBV DNA by real time PCR (HBV > 60 IU/mL)
6. Compensated liver function (Child-Pugh-Turcotte score ≤7, prothrombin time 3 sec above ULN or INR ≤1.5, serum albumin >3 g/dL, total bilirubin <2.5 mg/dL, no history of variceal bleeding, diuretics or ascites requiring paracentesis, hepatic encephalopathy)

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of treatment with nucleotide analogue other than 0.5 mg of ETV
2. Serum creatinine level > 1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min
3. Absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1000 cell/mL
4. Hemoglobin level ≤ 10 g/dL in men or ≤ 9 g/dL in women
5. Antiviral resistance mutations on rtT184, rtS202, or rtM250 + rtM204V/I
6. A positive antibody test for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis D virus
7. Pregnancy or lactation
8. HCC (in cases where alfa-fetoprotein levels were over 100 ng/mL, abdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance image was performed to exclude HCC)
9. Untreated malignancy other than HCC.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
entecavir	entecavir	standard drugs
tenofovir	tenofovir	study drugs

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Virologic response rate at year 1 (12 months) (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL)	up to the end of year 1 (12 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
-Degree of HBV DNA reduction, mean HBV DNA, biochemical and serologic response rates, resistance, and adverse events at year 1	up to the end of year 1 (12 months)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Korea University Ansan Hospital; 🇰🇷 Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of