Endotracheal Intubation Devices
- Conditions
- Intubation
- Registration Number
- NCT02277652
- Lead Sponsor
- International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the four different intubation devices in 6 different scenarios.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
- give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- minimum 1 year of work experience in emergency medicine
- experienced emergency medical personnel (paramedics, nurses, physicians)
- not meet the above criteria
- wrist or low back diseases
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to intubation 1 month time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cormack-Lehane grading 1 month self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)
Success of intubation 1 month effectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations.
POGO score 1 month self-reported percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score
VAS score 1 month participants were asked which method they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
🇵🇱Warsaw, Masovia, Poland
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education🇵🇱Warsaw, Masovia, PolandLukasz SzarpakContact(+48)500186225lukasz.szarpak@gmail.com