MedPath

Endotracheal Intubation Devices

Not Applicable
Conditions
Intubation
Registration Number
NCT02277652
Lead Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the four different intubation devices in 6 different scenarios.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • minimum 1 year of work experience in emergency medicine
  • experienced emergency medical personnel (paramedics, nurses, physicians)
Exclusion Criteria
  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to intubation1 month

time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cormack-Lehane grading1 month

self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)

Success of intubation1 month

effectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations.

POGO score1 month

self-reported percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score

VAS score1 month

participants were asked which method they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

🇵🇱

Warsaw, Masovia, Poland

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
🇵🇱Warsaw, Masovia, Poland
Lukasz Szarpak
Contact
(+48)500186225
lukasz.szarpak@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.