Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02277652
NCT02277652
Unknown
Not Applicable

Comparison of Four Different Endotracheal Intubation Devices Performed by Emergency Medical Professionals: a Manikin Study With 6 Airway Scenarios

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education1 site in 1 country120 target enrollmentOctober 2014
ConditionsIntubation

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Intubation
Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Enrollment
120
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Time to intubation
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the four different intubation devices in 6 different scenarios.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2014
End Date
November 2014
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Lukasz Szarpak

Lukasz Szarpak

National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • minimum 1 year of work experience in emergency medicine
  • experienced emergency medical personnel (paramedics, nurses, physicians)

Exclusion Criteria

  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time to intubation

Time Frame: 1 month

time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Cormack-Lehane grading(1 month)
  • Success of intubation(1 month)
  • POGO score(1 month)
  • VAS score(1 month)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials