MRI in Normal Ileal Pouches, and a Feasibility Study of Dynamic MRI Enema and Defaecating MRI Pouchography
- Conditions
- Colitis, UlcerativeIleal Pouches
- Interventions
- Other: MRI with ileal pouch contrast and enema.
- Registration Number
- NCT02925260
- Lead Sponsor
- London North West Healthcare NHS Trust
- Brief Summary
A study to investigate the prevalence of pelvic collections in a representative sample of participants with normally functioning ileal pouches. It also aims to establish the feasibility and reporting variables for dynamic MRI enemas in ileal pouches and defaecating enema pouchography.
- Detailed Description
Ulcerative Colitis Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is the most common of the inflammatory bowel diseases, with approximately 146,000 sufferers in the UK (NICE, 2011). Unlike other inflammatory bowel diseases, the inflammation in UC affects only the large bowel, starting at the rectum and extending proximally (towards the mouth end of the gut). Three in four patients are managed with medical treatments with acceptable control of their disease, but patients may require surgical removal of their large bowel for several reasons. The one in four patients who have their colon removed (colectomy) either need an emergency operation for infection, perforation or bleeding, or a planned operation for failure of medical management, intolerance to medication, cancer or steroid dependence (1). Because the inflammation is confined only to the colon, this surgery is curative.
Having removed the large bowel, there are options with regard to what to do with the end of the remaining small bowel, the ileum. In 1978 Professor Sir Alan Parks and Professor John Nicholls publicised their operation for 'restorative proctocolectomy' (RPC) folding and suturing together loops of small bowel to create a 'pouch' to take over the reservoir function of the rectum, and giving the patient the chance of continence without the need for a stoma (2,3). This operation has become extremely popular over the last 38 years, and is considered internationally to be the gold standard for 'restorative proctocolectomy' in patients who choose not to have a permanent stoma (4).
The operation has been refined in the years since it's introduction (5), with roughly two thirds of patients enjoying acceptable function. However, the complications associated with creating an RPC; notably pelvic sepsis, fistulae, poor mechanical function and inflammation, mean that the cumulative rate of pouch failure is roughly 5% at five years, and up to 15% at 15 years (Ryoo et al. 2014; Remzi et al. 2015; Sherman et al. 2014; R. et al. 2012; Papadopoulos et al. 2010).
Pouch-Related Septic Complications St Mark's Hospital has one of the largest UK cohorts of patients with RPCs, and is a tertiary referral centre for pouch complications. Of the reasons for pouch failure, chronic pelvic sepsis is the major cause, at 50 to 60%. This is a long term infection in the pelvis around or near the pouch, causing inflammation and poor function.
The pouch itself may become inflamed, known as pouchitis, and the cause for this is unknown, but it is hypothesised that the inflammation is caused by a change in the type of bacteria present in the pouch as opposed to the small bowel when it was in normal continuity.
Generally speaking, the management of pelvic sepsis causing pouch function is to surgically or radiologically drain the pelvic collection, or eventually surgically remove the pouch. The management of pouchitis (primary idiopathic pouchitis) is primarily with antibiotics, but in prolonged cases where antibiotics have been ineffective it may be in the patient's benefit to treat the inflammation with steroids or 'biologic' medications. These medications act by suppressing the body's innate immune response, and it would be inappropriate to use these medications if the true cause of inflammation is ongoing sepsis in the pelvis because this infection would likely become significantly worse, causing systemic infection (sepsis).
Unpublished research from St Mark's completed at the end of 2015 http://scripties.umcg.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/root/geneeskunde/2016/PloegVvander/ showed that in 68 patients treated for primary idiopathic pouchitis, 38% had an incidental pre-sacral collection identified on MRI, potentially consistent with pelvic sepsis driving the inflammation, rather than the inflammation rising primarily from the pouch itself.
Five patients went on to have drainage of the pelvic sepsis, with resolution of symptoms in only one. Therefore, based on this series, the significance of a pre-sacral collection on MRI in the context of pouchitis is unknown. Beyond this, it is not known how often this finding may be present as a 'normal variant' in patients with normal functioning pouches. The proposed trial would help to guide clinical management of patients with pouchitis and pre-sacral collections.
Pouch Evacuatory Dysfunction
A different type of problem with ileal pouches is the inability to easily evacuate the pouch. The majority of patients with normally functioning pouches, pressure to open their bowels is felt just like people with normal anatomy. Some patients have difficulty evacuating the pouch, often without an obvious inflammatory or anatomical cause. These patients are often investigated with defaecating pouchography, which is an investigation using moving x-ray images of radio-opaque contrast material being evacuated by the patient. A study conducted at St Mark's and published in August 2016 (11) demonstrated that this investigation has a relatively poor diagnostic value, partly due to the fact that there is no established range of normal findings. Using moving MRI images in patients with normal anatomy (called MRI defaecating proctography) is replacing the use of x-ray moving images (fluoroscopy) as there is as much, if not greater detail on the images, and there is no radiation exposure for the patient.
This study would be a pilot trial of the use of defaecating MRI in patients with pouches, (defaecating MRI pouchography) to establish whether the technique translates to patients with pouches instead of a rectum, and to establish what the range of normal findings are before going on to utilise the technique in patients with evacuatory dysfunction. This technique has not yet been described in the medical literature.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 19
-
• Ileal pouch reservoir in situ
- Greater than three years since closure of ileostomy
- Normal pouch function as defined by Orësland score of <4
- Never had a diagnosis of pouchitis
- Never had treatment for pouchitis
- No evidence of pouchitis on rigid pouchoscopy
- CRP <10
-
• Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) See appendix 1.
- Unable or unwilling to agree to informed consent
- Known inability to tolerate MRI (e.g. impaired mobility or claustrophobia)
- Known gadolinium allergy
- Known inability to maintain anal continence
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients with normal ileal pouches MRI with ileal pouch contrast and enema. Inclusion Criteria * Ileal pouch reservoir in situ * Greater than three years since closure of ileostomy * Normal pouch function as defined by Orësland score of \<4 * Never had a diagnosis of pouchitis * Never had treatment for pouchitis * No evidence of pouchitis on rigid pouchoscopy * CRP \<10
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The prevalence of pelvic collections in a representative sample of patients with normally functioning ileal pouches. Baseline ( MRI scan)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assess the patient experience of MRI pouchography using enemas Baseline ( MRI scan) Non-validated questionnaire assessment of patient anxiety, comfort, embarrassment and confidence in the outcome.
A descriptive assessment of the normal variation of ileal pouches on MRI scans. Baseline ( MRI scan)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
St Mark's Hospital
🇬🇧London, Middlesex, United Kingdom