Long vs Extended-short Nail When Treating Proximal Femur Fractures
- Conditions
- Hip Fractures
- Interventions
- Device: TFNA extended-short nail (235 mm)Device: TFNA long nail (260-480mm)
- Registration Number
- NCT04652310
- Lead Sponsor
- Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
- Brief Summary
Fractures of the upper part of the femur may be treated with intramedullary nails. There are different designs to choose from. The intention of this RCT is to compare two nails with some of the same properties, but with different lengths. Usually, it is the surgeon who decides which nail to be used. The literature indicates that there is a lack of good evidence in the decision-making, and that the choice often depends on personal preferences and experience of the surgeon. Therefore, the investigators want to compare whether one of the nails has a better outcome than the other, and in that way be able to give some clearer guidelines for treatment. Patients will be randomized into two groups, one receiving a long nail and one receiving an extended-short nail and compare surgical and functional outcomes. Information from the operation and subsequent check-ups will be analysed. The hypothesis is that the extended-short nail can reduce operating time, bleeding, fluoroscopy time and give equal or better functional outcome, without increasing reoperation rates or mortality.
- Detailed Description
Background Intramedullary nails have in recent years become the preferred technique compared to DHS when treating proximal femur fractures. A Norwegian RCT has showed the same frequency of postoperative pain, functional outcome and rate of reoperations comparing the two techniques. Nails are usually provided in a long and short model. Deciding which nail length to use is highly discussed, and often a long nail is preferred, because it gives a theoretically more stable and secure fixation of the femur. There are, however many advantages of using a short nail. It is less time consuming as there is no need for reaming, securing the long nail distally requires more fluoroscopy time, and distal locking of the long nail has also been shown to increase the risk of perioperative fractures. Perioperative bleeding and postoperative blood transfusions are reduced when using a short nail, and a long nail may also give more pain distally around the thigh and around the knee owing to cortical impingement. Finally, the long nail is more expensive compared to short models. There is a perception in the orthopedic society that there's a higher risk of periprosthetic fractures with short nails, but the latest generations of nails have improved this problem. Most studies report no difference in periprostetic fractures between long and short nails. Recently, new extended-short versions of medullary nails are being produced. The extended-short nail combines the mechanical properties seen in a long nail and the surgical simplicity of a short nail. This new nail type may replace the use of several long nails being placed just to be on the safe side, and thus reduce operating time, bleeding and postoperative pain associated with a long nail. Biomechanical studies have showed that the mechanical properties of long and extended-short nails are predominantly comparable, but to our knowledge no clinical studies comparing the extended-short and long nails have been performed to date. The advantages of an extended-short nail are potentially great, which makes it important to clarify which opportunities there are to benefit from this type of nail for certain types of fractures, both in the interest of the patient as well as the economic healthcare perspective.
Purpose In a well-defined population of patients with proximal femur fractures within a certain anatomical area the aim is to compare the extended-short nail with the long nail, to evaluate differences in functional and surgical outcome.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 800
- Intertrochanteric, pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures
- Distal fracture limit within 4 cm below the trochanter minor
- Intramedullary nailing with TFNA-nail is indicated
- Patient is fit for surgery.
- AO 31-A3 fractures (revers oblique fractures)
- Cognitively impaired patients who themselves cannot understand the study information and give informed consent, and do not have a next of kin or legal guardian who can give consent on their behalf.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Extended-Short Nail TFNA extended-short nail (235 mm) Implantation of TFNA extended-short nail (235 mm) Long nail TFNA long nail (260-480mm) Implantation of TFNA long nail (260-480 mm)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)-score At 3 months and 1 year Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)-score, ranges from 0-12, 12 is the best indicating a good physical function.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in Operation time Surgery date Operation time in minutes
Difference in EQ5D-5L (EuroQoL 5L - health-related quality of life) 3 months and 1 year EQ5D-5L (EuroQoL 5L - health-related quality of life)measures health status terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Mobility dimension asks about the person's walking ability. Self-care dimension asks about the ability to wash or dress by oneself, and usual activities dimension measures performance in "work, study, housework, family or leisure activities". In pain/discomfort dimension, it asks how much pain or discomfort they have, and in anxiety/depression dimension, it asks how anxious or depressed they are. The respondents self-rate their level of severity for each dimension using three-level (EQ-5D-3L) or five-level (EQ-5D-5L) scale
Difference in Mortality Minimally 1 year Mortality after surgery
Difference in Harris Hip score 3 months and 1 year Harris Hip score, ranges from 0-100, 100 is the best score, a high score indicates good physical function.
Difference in Transfusion after surgery 2 weeks after surgery Need for transfusion of blood products after surgery
Difference in Postoperative complications Minimally 1 year Any postoperative complications
Difference in Fluoroscopy time Surgery date Fluoroscopy time during surgery
Difference in Blood loss Surgery date Blood loss during surgery
Difference in Reoperations Minimally 1 year Reoperations of any kind
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken HF
🇳🇴Drammen, Norway
Kongsberg hospital, Vestre Viken HF
🇳🇴Kongsberg, Norway