This a research study to compare the functioning of two devices used to support breathing during anaesthesia {air-Q(standard cuffed) with ProSeal LMA} in children undergoing eye operatio
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Adequacy of ventilation provided by air-Q VS ProSeal LMA in Children undergoing ophthalmic procedures
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/02/011674
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anesthesiology Pain medicine and Critical Care AIIMS New Delhi
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA I and II
Planned for elective Ophthalmic operation
Exclusion Criteria
Refusal of childâ??s parental/LAR consent to participate in the study
Suspected or known difficult airway
Active infection in the respiratory tract
Lung disease
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To assess the Oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q® when compared to ProSealTM LMA <br/ ><br>Timepoint: Measured 5 minutes after successful confirmation of effective ventilation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method - Time to insert SAD <br/ ><br> - Number of attempts <br/ ><br> - Hemodynamic response after insertion <br/ ><br> - Post-operative laryngospasm <br/ ><br> - Post-operative desaturationTimepoint: Hemodynamic parameters measured at 0 min ( after entry into operation theatre) before insertion and 3 min after successful confirmation of adequate ventilation.