A Study of Herceptin (Trastuzumab)and Biomarkers in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00885755
- Lead Sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Brief Summary
This single arm study will evaluate alterations in molecular marker expression in HER2-positive targeted therapy, and will evaluate the effect of continued treatment with Herceptin and Xeloda beyond progression following initial Herceptin-taxane chemotherapy. Patients who develop progressive disease will receive first-line Herceptin (8mg/kg iv loading dose and 6mg/kg iv every 3 weeks) + taxane therapy. patients who develop progressive disease within 9 weeks of treatment will continue treatment with Herceptin in combination with Xeloda (1000mg/m2 po bid on days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle).Biopsies of tumor tissue will be taken for biomarker and gene profiling evaluation. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, intolerable side effects or patient choice, and the target sample size is 100 individuals.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 33
- female patients, >=18 years of age;
- HER2-positive breast cancer;
- al least one metastatic site amenable for core biopsy;
- left ventricular ejection fraction >50%.
- prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant Herceptin within past 6 months;
- prior adjuvant taxane therapy within past 12 months;
- use of chemotherapy, immunotherapy or biological anticancer therapy within past 3 weeks;
- known bleeding diatheses.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 1 trastuzumab [Herceptin] - 1 Standard taxane therapy - 1 capecitabine [Xeloda] -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Part I: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Biomarker End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months Progression was defined as an increase by at least 20 percent (%) from the smallest value in the Sum of Longest Diameter (SLD) of lesions. Biomarkers investigated: p95 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (p95HER2) positive (+ve) and negative (-ve) , insulin growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) less than (\<) median and greater than or equal to (≥) median membrane H score, c-MET \<median and ≥median membrane H score, phosphatase and tensin homolog gene (PTEN) \<median and ≥median cytoplasm H score, HER2 \<median and ≥median membrane H score, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) catalytic subunit wild type (WT) and mutation (M), and FC gamma receptors IIIa homozygous Phenyl alanine (FF), heterozygous Phenyl alanine/Valine (VF) and homozygous Valine (VV), receptor IIa Phenotypes homozygous Histidine (HH), heterozygous Histidine/Arginine (HR) and homozygous Arginine (RR) IIb phenotypes homozygous Isoleucien (II),heterozygous Isoleucine/Threonine (IT) and homozygous Threonine (TT) .
Part II: TTP by Biomarker End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months TTP was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression. The relationship between TTP and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95 HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R \<median and ≥median, c-MET \<median and ≥median, PTEN \<median and ≥median, HER2 \<median and ≥median, PI3K catalytic subunit WT and M, and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb Phenotypes FF, VF and VV, HH, HR and RR, and II, IT and TT .
Part II: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Biomarker End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months PFS was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression or death.The relationship between PFS and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R \<median and ≥ median membrane H score, c-MET \<median and ≥median membrane H score, PTEN \<median and ≥median cytoplasm H score, HER2 \<median and ≥median membrane H score, PI3K catalytic subunit WT and M, and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb Phenotypes FF, VF and VV, HH, HR and RR, and II, IT and TT.
Part I: Time to Progression (TTP) by Biomarker End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 weeks Progression was defined as an increase by at least 20% from the smallest value in the SLD of lesions.TTP was determined as the time in months from the date of screening until first progression.The relationship between PFS and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95 HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R \<median and ≥median, c-MET \<median and ≥median, PTEN \<median and ≥median, HER2 \<median and ≥median, PI3K catalytic subunit WT and M, and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb Phenotypes FF, VF and VV, HH, HR and RR, and II, IT and TT . The correlation between the biomarker variables and TTP were investigated using a univariate Cox regression model and time-to-event methods (Kaplan-Meier).
Part I: Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD) or Progrerssive Disease (PD) by Biomarker End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 weeks BOR was defined according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. The relationship between best response and the following biomarkers was investigated: p95 HER2 (+ve/-ve), IGF1R, c-MET, PTEN, HER2 (median/≥median), PI3K catalytic subunit (WT/M), and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb (phenotypes FF, VF, VV, HH, HR, RR and II, IT and TT respectively). The correlation between the biomarker variables and percentage of participants with best response were investigated using a univariate regression analysis.
Part II: Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR, PR, SD or PD by Biomarker End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months Best Overall response was defined according to RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm.PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. The relationship between best response and the following biomarkers was investigated: p95 HER2 (+ve/-ve), IGF1R, c-MET, PTEN, HER2 (\<median/≥median) , PI3K catalytic subunit (WT/M), and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb (phenotypes FF, VF, VV, HH, HR, RR and II, IT and TT respectively). The correlation between the biomarker variables and percentage of participants with best response were investigated using a univariate regression analysis.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Part I: TTP in Intent to Treat (ITT) Population End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months TTP was determined as the time in months from the date of screening until first progression. In participants with measurable disease, progression was defined according to RECIST (SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study \[including baseline, if that is the smallest\]). In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment.
Overall Survival in ITT Population End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until death (up to 46 months) Overall survival was calculated in months from the day of screening until death.
Part II: PFS in ITT Population End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months PFS was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression or death. In participants with measurable disease progression was defined according to RECIST (SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study \[including baseline, if that is the smallest\]). In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment.
Overall Survival in Per Protocol Population End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until death (up to 46 months) Overall survival was calculated in months from the day of screening until death.
Part II: TTP in Intent to Treat (ITT) Population End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months TTP was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression. In participants with measurable disease progression was defined according to RECIST(SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study \[including baseline, if that is the smallest\]). In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment.
Part I: PFS in ITT Population End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months PFS was determined as the time in months from the date of screening until first progression. In participants with measurable disease, progression was defined according to RECIST (SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study \[including baseline, if that is the smallest\]).. In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment.
Part I and II: Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR or PR in ITT Population End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months Best Overall response was defined according to RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions.
Part I and II: Percentage of Participants With a Response by Best Overall Response by CR, PR, SD or PD in ITT Population End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months Best Overall response was defined according to RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions.
Trial Locations
- Locations (13)
Christie Hospital; Breast Cancer Research Office
🇬🇧Manchester, United Kingdom
Mount Medical Center
🇦🇺Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Karolinska Hospital; Oncology - Radiumhemmet
🇸🇪Stockholm, Sweden
Akademiska sjukhuset, Onkologkliniken
🇸🇪Uppsala, Sweden
Hull Royal Infirmary
🇬🇧Hull, United Kingdom
Eastern Health Breast Cancer Research
🇦🇺East Ringwood, Victoria, Australia
Royal North Shore Hospital; Oncology
🇦🇺St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Medical Oncology
🇦🇺Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Border Medical Oncology; Murray Valley Private Hospital
🇦🇺Wodonga, Victoria, Australia
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla; Servicio de Oncologia
🇪🇸Santander, Cantabria, Spain
Royal Perth Hospital; Department of Medical Oncology
🇦🇺Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Nottingham City Hospital; Oncology
🇬🇧Nottingham, United Kingdom
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia; Servicio de Onco-hematologia
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain