跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04697836
NCT04697836已完成不适用

Can Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Cervical Plexus Block Combined With Translaryngeal Block For Tracheostomy Be An Alternative To General Anesthesia?

Namik Kemal University2 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 29 人开始时间: 2020年3月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
29
试验地点
2
主要终点
pain score (NRS)

研究概览

简要总结

Current healthcare delivery models emphasize enhanced postoperative recovery (ERAS) with minimal morbidity and shorter hospital stays. Most tracheostomy cases are tumour patients. The more the patients have difficulty in breathing, the more difficult it is to anaesthetize them. Adequate intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia with minimal sedation play an essential role in this patient model. In tracheostomy patients, moving away from the general anaesthesia option increases airway safety, and avoiding the local anaesthesia option in the incision area increases patient comfort. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of regional anaesthesia in tracheostomy patients.

详细描述

after being informed and about the study and potential risks, all patients giving written informed consent will undergo 24 hours screening period to determine the eligilibity for study entry. After a computer-generated randomization list with a 1:1 intergroup ratio, ensuring equal distribution in the two groups, 30 opaque sealed envelopes numbered 1-30 were prepared. The patients were randomly divided into the Group with bilateral CPB with 15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine or the patients with translaryngeal block with 5 ml 2% lidocaine in addition to bilateral CPB.

CPB: cervical plexus block.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Being in the age range of 18-65, with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification I-III and scheduled for elective or emergency tracheostomy.
  • A sufficient level of education to understand the study procedures and agree to participate in the study

排除标准

  • inability to cooperate
  • dementia,
  • allergy to local anesthetics and opioids
  • regular daily opioid requirements
  • abuse of alcohol or medication
  • local infection at the site of injection or systemic infection,
  • pregnancy.

结局指标

主要结局

pain score (NRS)

时间窗: 24 hours

A numerical rating scale (NRS) requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale. For example, 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable

pain related to incision

时间窗: 24 hours

A numerical rating scale (NRS) requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale. For example, 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable

nausea and vomiting

时间窗: 24 hours

YES/NO

time to first analgesic demand

时间窗: 24 hours from the pacu

Time of first analgesic need within the first 24 hours 0: within the first 12 hours 1: 12-24 hours

Patient tolerance as assessed by tracheostomy cannula comfort score

时间窗: 24 hours

1. = No reaction 2. = Slight grimacing 3. = Heavy grimacing 4. = Defensive movement of hands 5= Flexion of the head with defense

cough and gag score

时间窗: 24 hours

1. = None 2. = Slight 3. = Moderate 4. = Severe

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Namik Kemal University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ayhan ŞAHİN

Asistant Prof

Namik Kemal University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验