A Trial Comparing Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease

Phase 3

Terminated

Conditions: Prostate Cancer

Interventions: Drug: Degarelix
Drug: Leuprolide

Registration Number: NCT02663908

Lead Sponsor: Ferring Pharmaceuticals

Brief Summary: The purpose of this trial is to test if a marketed drug for advanced prostate cancer (FIRMAGON) can reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications as compared to another marketed drug for advanced prostate cancer (LUPRON DEPOT) in subjects with prostate cancer and cardiovascular disease.

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: TERMINATED

Sex: Male

Target Recruitment: 545

Inclusion Criteria

Advanced prostate cancer
Indication to initiate androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
Predefined cardiovascular disease

Exclusion Criteria

Previous or current hormonal management of prostate cancer (unless terminated at least 12 months prior to trial)
Acute cardiovascular disease in the previous 30 days

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Degarelix	Degarelix	-
Leuprolide	Leuprolide	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Occurrence of the Composite Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Endpoint; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial	Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	Composite MACE endpoint was defined as: death due to any cause, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke. Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) occurrence of composite MACE over time. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported. Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Stroke; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial	Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) stroke. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported. Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Unstable Angina Requiring Hospitalization; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial	Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) unstable angina requiring hospitalization. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported. Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Changes From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total and Quality of Life (QoL) Scores	Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)	Lower urinary tract symptoms were measured with the IPSS Version 1 (IPSS-1). The IPSS is a subject-administered questionnaire containing seven items to evaluate symptoms of urinary obstruction (incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, nocturia) over the preceding week. Each urinary symptom question was assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The total IPSS-1 score was then calculated as summation over the responses for all 7 questions. The total IPSS-1 score was transformed to a scale from 0 (lowest score) to 100 (highest score). Higher scores reflect higher severity of symptoms. The IPSS-1 included an additional single question to assess a subject's QoL in relation to his urinary symptoms; response to this question was analyzed separately and was not included in the total IPSS score. The score was similarly scaled from 0 to 100. Change from baseline in IPSS Total and QoL scores are presented.
Time From Randomization to Failure in Progression-free Survival (PFS); Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial	From randomization to end-of-trial for each subject (subjects not censored at Day 336)	Time to failure in PFS was defined as the time, measured in days, from randomization to the first occurrence of either death, radiographic disease progression, introduction of additional prostate cancer therapies for progression, or PSA failure. Subjects who discontinued treatment with IMP or withdrew from the trial were censored at the time of discontinuation/withdrawal. Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict failure in PFS. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.
Total Number of CV-related Hospitalization Events Over the Duration of the Trial	First dose of IMP to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	The total number of CV-related hospitalizations over the duration of the trial was defined as the number of hospitalizations due to CV-related adverse events, observed from the first exposure to IMP up until Day 336 for each subject.
Total Number of Coronary Artery By-pass Grafting (CABG) or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Procedures Over the Duration of the Trial	First dose of IMP to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	The total number of CABG or PCI procedures observed for each subject over the duration of the trial
Changes in Vital Signs	Baseline to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	Number of subjects shifting from normal value(s) in vital signs (pulse and blood pressure) at baseline to clinically significant abnormal value(s) at end-of-trial are presented. Note: Only subjects with appropriate baseline and post-baseline data are included in the evaluation.
Time From Randomization to Confirmed (Adjudicated) CV-related Death; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial	Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict confirmed (adjudicated) CV-related death. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported. Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Myocardial Infarction; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial	Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) myocardial infarction. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported. Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Time From Randomization to Death Due to Any Cause; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial	Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict death due to any cause. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported. Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Occurrence of Cardiovascular (CV)-Related Death, Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction or Non-fatal Stroke; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial	Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict confirmed (adjudicated) occurrence of CV-related death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported. Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Total Number of CV-related Emergency Room (ER) Visit Events Over the Duration of the Trial	First dose of IMP to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	CV-related ER visit events (that did not lead to hospitalization) was observed from the first exposure to IMP up until Day 336 for each subject.
Testosterone Levels at Days 28, 168 and 336 in the Degarelix and Leuprolide Treatment Groups	Days 28, 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)	Median levels and interquartile ranges for serum testosterone at Days 28, 168, and 336 are presented.
Change in Utility, Based on EuroQol Group 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)	Baseline to Day 336 (end-of-trial)	The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of 2 systems - the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ VAS is an overall estimation of the present health status. The results from the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire were converted into quality adjusted life year (QALY) units. The QALY is estimated by combining the value of life (utility value) and length of life. Quality adjusted life years are based on a principle assuming that a year of life lived in perfect health is worth 1 QALY and that a year of life lived in a state of less than perfect health is worth less than 1.
Changes From Baseline in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) Global Score	Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)	The DASI is a self-administered instrument developed to measure functional capacity in subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD). It contains 12 items referring to the present time, assessing the ability to perform physical tasks in five domains: personal care (1 item), ambulation (4 items), household tasks (4 items), sexual function (1 item) and recreation (2 items). Each question was answered by one of four options: 'yes with no difficulty' / 'yes, but with some difficulty' / 'no, I can't do this' / 'don't do this for other reasons'. A global score was calculated with a higher score indicating a higher functional capacity. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 58.2 points. Change from baseline in DASI Global score is presented.
Changes From Baseline in Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) Global Score and Score Per Domain	Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)	The CAQ is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure heart-focused anxiety in persons with or without heart disease. It contains 18 items referring to the present time assessing cardiac anxiety in three domains: fear (8 items, each item could be scored between 0 "never" to 4 "always", maximum total score 32), avoidance (5 items, each item could be scored between 0 "never" to 4 "always", maximum total score 20) and attention (5 items, each item could be scored between 0 "never" to 4 "always", maximum total score 20). A higher score indicated greater cardiac anxiety and the total score range was between 0 and 72. Change from baseline in CAQ Global score and score per domain are presented.
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs)	Start of IMP treatment until 3 months after last dosing of IMP	Adverse events were recorded from signed informed consent until end-of-trial. Adverse events with onset after start of IMP treatment, and within 3 months after (1 month=28 days) last dosing of IMP, were considered 'treatment-emergent' and are presented for the safety analysis set.
Intensity of AEs	Start of IMP treatment until 3 months after last dosing of IMP	The intensity of AE was graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (version 4.02) 5-point scale. AE were categorized as grade 1 Mild (minor; no specific medical intervention; asymptomatic laboratory findings only; marginal clinical relevance), Grade 2 Moderate (minimal intervention: local intervention; non-invasive intervention), Grade 3 Severe (significant symptoms, requiring hospitalization or invasive intervention; transfusion; elective interventional radiological procedure; therapeutic endoscopy or operation), Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling (complicated by acute, life-threatening metabolic or CV complications such as circulatory failure, hemorrhage, sepsis. Life-threatening physiologic consequences; need for intensive care or emergent invasive procedure; emergent interventional radiological procedure, therapeutic endoscopy or operation) and Grade 5 Death. Events with grades 3, 4 and 5 were categorized as severe.

Trial Locations

Locations (132): Fakultna nemocnica Nitra
🇸🇰
Nitra, Slovakia
Erlanger Health System
🇺🇸
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
J. Giddens Medicine Professional Corporation
🇨🇦
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Groote Schuur Hospital Department of Urology
🇿🇦
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
San Marcus Research Clinic Inc
🇺🇸
Miami, Florida, United States
Kansas City Urology Care
🇺🇸
Lenexa, Kansas, United States
Duke University Medical Center
🇺🇸
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Urology Center of Colorado
🇺🇸
Denver, Colorado, United States
Hôpital Henri Mondor
🇫🇷
Créteil, France
Arizona Institute of Urology
🇺🇸
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Urological Associates of Southern Arizona
🇺🇸
Tucson, Arizona, United States
San Diego Clinical Trials
🇺🇸
La Mesa, California, United States
Urology Associates, PA
🇺🇸
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
🇺🇸
Los Angeles, California, United States
Skyline Urology
🇺🇸
Torrance, California, United States
Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
🇺🇸
Miami Beach, Florida, United States
Springfield Clinic LLP
🇺🇸
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Urology of Indiana LLC
🇺🇸
Greenwood, Indiana, United States
Regional Urology, LLC
🇺🇸
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
First Urology PSC
🇺🇸
Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States
Montefiore Medical Center PRIME
🇺🇸
Bronx, New York, United States
Chesapeake Urology Associates, P.A.
🇺🇸
Towson, Maryland, United States
Urologic Consultants of Southeaster PA LLP
🇺🇸
Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States
Advanced Urology Centers of New York Elmont Division
🇺🇸
Elmont, New York, United States
Clinical Research Solutions PC
🇺🇸
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States
University of Pennsylvania
🇺🇸
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
🇨🇿
Praha, Czechia
Oblastni nemocnice Pribram a.s.
🇨🇿
Příbram, Czechia
G. Kenneth Jansz Medicine Professional Corporation
🇨🇦
Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava
🇨🇿
Ostrava, Czechia
Multiscan s.r.o.
🇨🇿
Pardubice, Czechia
Urocentrum Plzen
🇨🇿
Plzen, Czechia
Keski-Suomen keskussairaala
🇫🇮
Jyväskylä, Finland
Proton Therapy Center Czech s.r.o.
🇨🇿
Praha, Czechia
Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin Tripode
🇫🇷
Bordeaux, France
CHU de Grenoble - Hôpital Albert Michallon
🇫🇷
Grenoble, France
CH de Libourne- Hopital Robert Boulin
🇫🇷
Libourne, France
Hopital Claude Huriez - CHU Lille
🇫🇷
Lille, France
Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
🇩🇪
Freiburg, Baden Wuerttemberg, Germany
Praxisklinik Urologie Rhein Ruhr
🇩🇪
Mülheim, Nordrhein Westfalen, Germany
Staedtisches Klinikum Braunschweig GmbH - Standort Salzdahlumer
🇩🇪
Braunschweig, Niedersachsen, Germany
Gynaekologisches Zentrum Bonn-Friedensplatz
🇩🇪
Bonn, Germany
Urologische Gemeinschaftspraxis
🇩🇪
Herzogenaurach, Bayern, Germany
Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Doelau
🇩🇪
Halle, Sachsen Anhalt, Germany
University General Hospital of Heraklion
🇬🇷
Heraklion, Greece
General Hospital of Athens "Alexandra"
🇬🇷
Athens, Greece
Facharztpraxis für Urologie
🇩🇪
Lutherstadt Eisleben, Sachsen Anhalt, Germany
University of Patras Medical School
🇬🇷
Patras, Greece
Central Clinic of Athens
🇬🇷
Athens, Greece
Provita Profamilia
🇵🇱
Piotrków Trybunalski, Poland
FFSBI "The Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine"
🇷🇺
Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
FSBI "Moscow scientific research oncology institute"
🇷🇺
Moscow, Russian Federation
FSBSI "Russian Oncological Scientific Center n.a. N.N. Blokhin"
🇷🇺
Moscow, Russian Federation
Medical Center Avitsenna
🇷🇺
Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
CUIMED s.r.o.
🇸🇰
Bratislava, Slovakia
UROEXAM, spol. s r.o.
🇸🇰
Nitra, Slovakia
UROCENTRUM SALA s.r.o.
🇸🇰
Sala, Slovakia
Prince Philip Hospital
🇬🇧
Llanelli, Carmarthenshire, United Kingdom
Nemocnica Kosice-Saca, a.s.
🇸🇰
Košice, Slovakia
Univerzitna nemocnica Martin
🇸🇰
Martin, Slovakia
Privatna Urologicka ambulancia
🇸🇰
Trenčín, Slovakia
Scunthorpe General Hospital
🇬🇧
Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom
St Peter's Hospital
🇬🇧
Chertsey, Surrey, United Kingdom
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (Wonford)
🇬🇧
Exeter, United Kingdom
Salford Royal
🇬🇧
Salford, United Kingdom
Addenbrooke's Hospital
🇬🇧
Cambridge, United Kingdom
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
🇨🇦
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Uro Laval
🇨🇦
Laval, Quebec, Canada
BHI of Omsk region "Clinical Oncology Dispensary
🇷🇺
Omsk, Russian Federation
Staedtisches Klinikum Dresden Standort Dresden-Friedrichstadt
🇩🇪
Dresden, Sachsen, Germany
Krajska zdravotni a.s. - Masarykova nemocnice v Usti nad Labem o.z.
🇨🇿
Ústí Nad Labem, Czechia
Florida Urology Partners
🇺🇸
Tampa, Florida, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.
🇺🇸
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Comprehensive Urologic Care
🇺🇸
Lake Barrington, Illinois, United States
Urology Center of Alabama PC
🇺🇸
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Arizona College of Medicine
🇺🇸
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Innovative Clinical Research Institute
🇺🇸
Whittier, California, United States
University of California, Irvine Medical Center
🇺🇸
Orange, California, United States
Yale University
🇺🇸
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Urologic Surgeons of Washington
🇺🇸
Washington, District of Columbia, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute, Inc.
🇺🇸
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Holy Name Medical Center
🇺🇸
Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
Delaware Valley Urology LLC Westhampton
🇺🇸
Mount Laurel, New Jersey, United States
Signal Point Clinical Research Center
🇺🇸
Dayton, Ohio, United States
SUNY Upstate Medical University
🇺🇸
Syracuse, New York, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center-Salisbury, NC
🇺🇸
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
Lancaster Urology
🇺🇸
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center
🇺🇸
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Urology of Virginia
🇺🇸
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)
🇺🇸
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
University of Washington School of Medicine
🇺🇸
Seattle, Washington, United States
Seattle Urology Research Center
🇺🇸
Burien, Washington, United States
The Male Health Centre Euroscope Inc
🇨🇦
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Urology Associates Urologic Medical Research
🇨🇦
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
🇨🇦
London, Ontario, Canada
Femalemale Health Centres
🇨🇦
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
Jewish General Hospital / McGill University
🇨🇦
Montréal, Quebec, Canada
CHU de Québec -Hôtel-Dieu de Québec
🇨🇦
Québec, Canada
Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc
🇨🇿
Olomouc, Czechia
Tampereen yliopistollinen
🇫🇮
Tampere, Finland
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours
🇫🇷
Nantes, France
Hopital Edouard Herriot - CHU Lyon
🇫🇷
Lyon, France
Clinique Saint Jean Languedoc
🇫🇷
Toulouse, France
Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard
🇫🇷
Paris, France
Klinikum Oldenburg gGmbH
🇩🇪
Oldenburg, Niedersachsen, Germany
Urologie am Nordplatz
🇩🇪
Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany
Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH
🇩🇪
Moenchengladbach, Nordrhein Westfalen, Germany
T.Y.P.E.T. Hygeias Melathron Hospital
🇬🇷
Athens, Greece
SBHI of Sverdiovsk Region "Sverdiovsk Regional Clinical Hospital #1
🇷🇺
Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
City Clinical Hospital n.a. Botkin
🇷🇺
Moscow, Russian Federation
General Hospital Papageorgiou
🇬🇷
Thessaloníki, Greece
Swietokrzyskie Centrum Onkologii
🇵🇱
Kielce, Poland
WroMedica
🇵🇱
Wrocław, Poland
FBHI Privolzhskiy District Medical Centre FMBA of Russia
🇷🇺
Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation
DERMED Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o.
🇵🇱
Łódź, Poland
SBEI HPE "Moscow State Medical and Dentistry University n.a. A. I. Evdokimov"
🇷🇺
Moscow, Russian Federation
Urocentrum Bratislava s.r.o.
🇸🇰
Bratislava, Slovakia
UROCENTRUM LEVICE s.r.o.
🇸🇰
Levice, Slovakia
UROAMB s.r.o.
🇸🇰
Liptovský Mikuláš, Slovakia
Vychodoslovensky onkologicky ustav, a.s.
🇸🇰
Kosice, Slovakia
Zeleznicna nemocnica Kosice
🇸🇰
Košice, Slovakia
MILAB s.r.o.
🇸🇰
Prešov, Slovakia
MIRAMED s.r.o
🇸🇰
Rimavska Sobota, Slovakia
Fakultna nemocnica s poliklinikou Zilina
🇸🇰
Žilina, Slovakia
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
🇬🇧
Sheffield, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Institut Sainte Catherine
🇫🇷
Avignon, France
Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc.
🇺🇸
Anaheim, California, United States
Urology Group of New Mexico PC
🇺🇸
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Iowa Clinic
🇺🇸
West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Clinical Research Center of Florida
🇺🇸
Pompano Beach, Florida, United States
Clinical Trials Research
🇺🇸
Lincoln, California, United States
Charing Cross Hospital
🇬🇧
London, Greater London, United Kingdom