ADJUST: A Study on MDT Prognostication
- Conditions
- Terminal Illness
- Registration Number
- NCT04568629
- Lead Sponsor
- University College, London
- Brief Summary
This study investigates how clinicians form intuitive judgements about the prognoses of palliative care patients after receiving advice perceived as coming from either a team member or an algorithm.
- Detailed Description
Using the Judge-Advisor System, the investigators will recruit clinicians working in palliative care for adults. Participants will be asked to complete an online survey and review five patient summaries ("vignettes") based on real cases derived from a previous study. Clinicians will be presented with key prognostic information and will be asked to provide an estimate of the probability that the patient will survive for two weeks (0-100%). After providing this initial estimate, participants will receive prognostic advice. While in reality all participants will receive the same advice, participants will be randomised into two groups and these groups will be informed that the advice is either: (1) provided by an algorithm; or (2) provided by a team colleague. Participants will then be given the opportunity to give a second, possibly revised estimate in the light of the advice received.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 323
- Clinicians working in an adult palliative care service
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
- None
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Probability of survival estimate Participants will have up to 7 months (until the study closes) to provide an estimate for each vignette Clinicians' estimates of the probability of a patient surviving for two weeks (0-100%)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Participants' weighting policies (characteristics of the participants) Participants will have up to 7 months (until the study closes) to provide an estimate for each vignette Participants' responses to demographic questions
Participants' weighting policies (the advice itself) Participants will have up to 7 months (until the study closes) to provide an estimate for each vignette Strength of the prognostic advice provided by the advisor (0-100%)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University College London
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
University College London🇬🇧London, United Kingdom