Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00937924
NCT00937924
Completed
Phase 4

A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Promethazine and Diphenhydramine as Adjunct Sedatives for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

University of California, Irvine1 site in 1 country304 target enrollmentFebruary 2008

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Meperidine, Midazolam
Conditions
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)
Sponsor
University of California, Irvine
Enrollment
304
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Average Percentage of Sedation Failures
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare meperidine/midazolam with diphenhydramine, meperidine/midazolam with promethazine, and meperidine/midazolam with placebo as sedation methods. The investigators are interested to see whether adjunct sedatives (diphenhydramine and promethazine) will improve sedation.

Detailed Description

Comparing sedation techniques during invasive endoscopic procedures such as ERCP and EUS is a relatively unexplored area of clinical research. In particular, the effectiveness of adjunct sedatives such as diphenhydramine and promethazine during ERCP/EUS procedures has not been studied. Achieving a moderate sedation level may be ideal for ERCP/EUS procedures in order to provide adequate patient comfort, amnesia, and completion of intended endoscopic procedures. The relevance of further studies in this area is apparent. In terms of clinical practice; over-sedation can lead to decreased airway protection, longer post-procedural recovery times, and unnecessary drug cost; under-sedation can lead to patient anxiety, agitation, recall, and longer procedural time.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 2008
End Date
June 2012
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Kenneth J. Chang

Principal Investigator

University of California, Irvine

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Willing participants between 18 and 75 years of age who present for ERCP or EUS at H.H. Comprehensive Chao Digestive Disease Center.

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of allergic or adverse reactions to midazolam, diphenhydramine, or promethazine.
  • Acute asthma, narrow angle glaucoma, concurrent use of potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 (amprenavir, atazanavir, or ritonavir), pregnancy, or the inability to consent.
  • Patients with conditions that preclude safe conscious sedation will be excluded.

Arms & Interventions

Meperidine and midazolam group

Control. Normal Saline Injections.

Intervention: Meperidine, Midazolam

Meperidine and midazolam, plus Diphenhydramine group

Diphenhydramine injections given as adjunct sedative.

Intervention: Meperidine, Midazolam

Meperidine and midazolam, plus Diphenhydramine group

Diphenhydramine injections given as adjunct sedative.

Intervention: Diphenhydramine

Meperidine and midazolam, plus Promethazne group

Promethazine given as an adjunct sedative.

Intervention: Meperidine, Midazolam

Meperidine and midazolam, plus Promethazne group

Promethazine given as an adjunct sedative.

Intervention: Promethazine

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Average Percentage of Sedation Failures

Time Frame: From onset of sedation to completion of procedure, approximately 1 hour.

The percentage of participants who could not complete the procedure due inability to achieve proper sedation level

Time to Achieve Adequate Level of Sedation to Begin Procedure

Time Frame: Pre-Endoscopic Procedure (up to 1 hour maximum)

Time for Recovery

Time Frame: Post-Endoscopic Procedure

Secondary Outcomes

  • Adverse Symptoms From Sedative Agents(Approximately 3 hours.)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials