Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07714148
NCT07714148CompletedNot Applicable

Effects of Visual Stimulus-Based Cognitive-Motor Agility Exercise on Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Functional Performance in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University1 site in 1 country41 target enrollmentStarted: April 1, 2026Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
41
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This randomized controlled trial examined the effects of adding a brief visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercise component to a multicomponent exercise program in community-dwelling older adults. Participants were randomized to either an experimental group or an active control group. Both groups participated in supervised multicomponent exercise sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks. Each session lasted 45 minutes. During the final 10 minutes of each session, the experimental group performed the visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercises, whereas the active control group performed time-matched low-intensity activities. The primary outcome was global cognitive performance assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Secondary outcomes included hand and foot visual-motor response time, visual working memory, and functional performance.

Detailed Description

This study was designed as an 8-week, parallel-group randomized controlled exercise intervention in community-dwelling older adults. The study aimed to determine whether adding a brief Light Trainer-assisted visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercise component to a multicomponent exercise program would provide additional benefits for cognitive, psychomotor, and functional performance.

After completion of baseline assessments, eligible participants were randomized to either an experimental group or an active control group. Both groups participated in supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks, for a total of 16 sessions. Each session lasted 45 minutes. The first 35 minutes of each session consisted of the same multicomponent exercise program in both groups. This program included light-paced walking, mobility exercises, multidirectional stepping, balance tasks, agility exercise, coordination exercises, low-resistance strengthening exercises, and functional movement combinations.

During the final 10 minutes of each session, participants in the experimental group completed visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercises using the Light Trainer system. These tasks required participants to perceive randomized visual stimuli, select an appropriate motor response, and respond as quickly and accurately as possible using hand or foot movements. The Light Trainer component included 13 repetitions of 30-second task intervals separated by 15-second rest periods. Task difficulty progressed across the 8-week intervention by increasing the number of modules from two to six and by increasing task complexity, stimulus randomness, movement direction changes, response speed requirements, and cognitive-motor demands.

Participants in the active control group completed the same 35-minute multicomponent exercise program followed by a time-matched 10-minute low-intensity activity period. These activities included supervised stretching, mobility, agility, balance, or recovery exercises and did not include visual stimulus-based response tasks, rapid decision-making, reactive agility tasks, or Light Trainer-assisted exercises.

Assessments were performed at baseline and after the 8-week intervention period. The primary outcome was global cognitive performance assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Secondary outcomes included hand and foot visual-motor response time, visual working memory performance time and accuracy, Ten-Step Test, 30-second Chair Stand Test, 30-second Arm Curl Test, and 8-Foot Up-and-Go Test. The study was conducted in community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older who were able to ambulate independently and follow basic exercise and testing instructions.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
60 Years to 81 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older
  • Able to ambulate independently
  • Able to understand and follow basic exercise and testing instructions
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of 23 or higher
  • No health condition that would limit safe participation in exercise
  • Able to participate regularly in the 8-week exercise program

Exclusion Criteria

  • Serious cardiovascular, neurological, orthopedic, or vestibular disease that could prevent safe participation in exercise
  • Recent surgery
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Severe visual or hearing problems
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment score below 23
  • Use of medications known to substantially affect cognitive, psychomotor, balance, or motor performance
  • Very low physical function preventing safe participation in the exercise program

Arms & Interventions

Visual stimuli Cognitive-Motor Agility Exercise

Experimental

Participants in this arm completed supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks. Each 45-minute session included the same 35-minute multicomponent exercise program performed by both groups, followed by 10 minutes of Light Trainer-assisted visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercise. The Light Trainer component included reactive visual-motor tasks requiring participants to respond to randomized visual stimuli using hand and foot movements.

Intervention: Multicomponent Exercise Program (Behavioral)

Visual stimuli Cognitive-Motor Agility Exercise

Experimental

Participants in this arm completed supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks. Each 45-minute session included the same 35-minute multicomponent exercise program performed by both groups, followed by 10 minutes of Light Trainer-assisted visual stimulus-based cognitive-motor agility exercise. The Light Trainer component included reactive visual-motor tasks requiring participants to respond to randomized visual stimuli using hand and foot movements.

Intervention: Visual Stimulus-Based Cognitive-Motor Agility Exercise (Behavioral)

Active Control: Multicomponent Exercise With Low-Intensity Activities

Active Comparator

Participants in this arm completed supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks. Each 45-minute session included the same 35-minute multicomponent exercise program performed by the experimental group, followed by 10 minutes of time-matched low-intensity activities. These activities included supervised stretching, mobility, balance, or recovery exercises and did not include visual stimulus-based response tasks, rapid decision-making, reactive agility tasks, or Light Trainer-assisted exercises.

Intervention: Multicomponent Exercise Program (Behavioral)

Active Control: Multicomponent Exercise With Low-Intensity Activities

Active Comparator

Participants in this arm completed supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks. Each 45-minute session included the same 35-minute multicomponent exercise program performed by the experimental group, followed by 10 minutes of time-matched low-intensity activities. These activities included supervised stretching, mobility, balance, or recovery exercises and did not include visual stimulus-based response tasks, rapid decision-making, reactive agility tasks, or Light Trainer-assisted exercises.

Intervention: Time-Matched Low-Intensity Activities (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score

Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks

Global cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. The total score was recorded at baseline and after the 8-week intervention period. Higher scores indicate better global cognitive performance.

Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score

Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment was used to assess global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. Change from baseline to 8 weeks was evaluated. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment was used to assess global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. Change from baseline to 8 weeks was evaluated.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Hand Visual-Motor Response Time(Baseline and after 8 weeks)
  • Change in Foot Visual-Motor Response Time(Baseline and after 8 weeks)
  • Change in Visual Working Memory Performance(Baseline and after 8 weeks)
  • Change in Ten-Step Test Time(Baseline and after 8 weeks)
  • Change in 30-Second Chair Stand Test Performance(Baseline and after 8 weeks)
  • Change in 30-Second Arm Curl Test Performance(Baseline and after 8 weeks)
  • Change in 8-Foot Up-and-Go Test Time(Baseline and after 8 weeks)
  • Change in Hand Visual-Motor Response Time(Baseline and 8 weeks)
  • Change in Foot Visual-Motor Response Time(Baseline and 8 weeks)
  • Change in Visual Working Memory Performance Time(Baseline and 8 weeks)
  • Change in Visual Working Memory Accuracy(Baseline and 8 weeks)
  • Change in 30-Second Chair Stand Test Performance(Baseline and 8 weeks)
  • Change in 30-Second Arm Curl Test Performance(Baseline and 8 weeks)
  • Change in 8-Foot Up-and-Go Test Time(Baseline and 8 weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Gulsah Sahin

Associate Professor, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials