Effect of two different PEEP Levels on ventilator settings, seal and oxygenation under Ventilation with a laryngeal mask airway

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Ventilation via laryngeal mask; T88.5; Other complications of anaesthesia

• Registration Number: DRKS00011170
• Lead Sponsor: niversität Leipzig, medizinische Fakultät

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2017-01-10
• Study Completion: 2020-02-28
• Results First Posted: 2022-10-01
• Last Update Posted: 19 August 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Complete
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 400

Inclusion Criteria

General anesthesia with indication for a laryngeal mask airway
- ASA I or II
- BMI

Exclusion Criteria

- ASA > II
- BMI > 30
- impossible informed consent
- Cardiopulmonary disease
- Patients with an increased risk of aspiration
- Other contraindications to the use of a laryngeal mask airway
- Pregnancy
- Participation in another interventional study
- Clinical necessity of intraoperative spontaneous breathing

Study & Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Seal during Ventilation (audible loss and / or difference between exsp. and insp. Minute volume)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
- Oxygenation<br>- dynamic compliance during ventilation<br>- rate of complications