Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01843296
NCT01843296
Completed
Phase 4

Comparison of the Effects of Three Methods of Intrathecal Bupivacaine; Bupivacaine-Fentanyl and Bupivacaine-Fentanyl-Magnesium Sulfate on Sensory-Motor Blocks and Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Disk Herniation Surgery

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences1 site in 1 country105 target enrollmentNovember 2012

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Magnesium Sulfate
Conditions
Lumbar Spine Disc Herniation
Sponsor
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Enrollment
105
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The sensory block regression
Status
Completed
Last Updated
12 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to Compare three methods of intrathecal bupivacaine; bupivacaine-fentanyl; bupivacaine-fentanyl-magnesium sulfate on sensory-motor blocks and postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar disk herniation surgery.

Detailed Description

* Comparison three methods of intrathecal bupivacaine;bupivacaine-fentanyl;bupivacaine-fentanyl-magnesium sulfate on sensory-motor blocks in patients undergoing lumbar disk herniation surgery * Comparison three methods of intrathecal bupivacaine;bupivacaine-fentanyl;bupivacaine-fentanyl-magnesium sulfate on postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar disk herniation surgery * Comparison three methods of intrathecal bupivacaine;bupivacaine-fentanyl;bupivacaine-fentanyl-magnesium sulfate on postoperative side effects in patients undergoing lumbar disk herniation surgery

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2012
End Date
April 2013
Last Updated
12 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Fereidoun Mortazavi Najafabadi, MD

fellowship of neuroanesthesia

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Candidate for lumbar disk herniation surgery
  • No contraindication to the spinal anesthesia
  • No history of allergy to opioids and magnesium sulfate
  • No peripheral or central neuropathies
  • No previous history of surgery on same disk level

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with intraoperative tearing of dural suc
  • Occuring of inadvertent intraoperative complications such as bleeding

Arms & Interventions

Magnesium

Patients in group C received a premixed solution of 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (3 ml) and 25 µg fentanyl (0.5cc) and 50 mg of magnesium sulfate 50% (0.1 ml) (Pasteur Institute Co, Tehran, Iran) for spinal anesthesia

Intervention: Magnesium Sulfate

Magnesium

Patients in group C received a premixed solution of 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (3 ml) and 25 µg fentanyl (0.5cc) and 50 mg of magnesium sulfate 50% (0.1 ml) (Pasteur Institute Co, Tehran, Iran) for spinal anesthesia

Intervention: Spinal Anesthesia

Magnesium

Patients in group C received a premixed solution of 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (3 ml) and 25 µg fentanyl (0.5cc) and 50 mg of magnesium sulfate 50% (0.1 ml) (Pasteur Institute Co, Tehran, Iran) for spinal anesthesia

Intervention: Bupivacaine

Magnesium

Patients in group C received a premixed solution of 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (3 ml) and 25 µg fentanyl (0.5cc) and 50 mg of magnesium sulfate 50% (0.1 ml) (Pasteur Institute Co, Tehran, Iran) for spinal anesthesia

Intervention: Fentanyl

Fentanyl

Patients in Fentanyl group received a premixed solution of of 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (3 ml) and 25 µg fentanyl (0.5cc),plus 0.1 cc preservative free 0.9% normal saline for spinal anesthesia

Intervention: Spinal Anesthesia

Fentanyl

Patients in Fentanyl group received a premixed solution of of 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (3 ml) and 25 µg fentanyl (0.5cc),plus 0.1 cc preservative free 0.9% normal saline for spinal anesthesia

Intervention: Bupivacaine

Fentanyl

Patients in Fentanyl group received a premixed solution of of 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (3 ml) and 25 µg fentanyl (0.5cc),plus 0.1 cc preservative free 0.9% normal saline for spinal anesthesia

Intervention: Fentanyl

Bupivacaine

Patients in Bupivacaine group(control) received a premixed solution of 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (3 ml), plus 0.6 cc preservative free 0.9% normal saline for spinal anesthesia

Intervention: Spinal Anesthesia

Bupivacaine

Patients in Bupivacaine group(control) received a premixed solution of 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (3 ml), plus 0.6 cc preservative free 0.9% normal saline for spinal anesthesia

Intervention: Bupivacaine

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The sensory block regression

Time Frame: From intrathecal injection until the sensory block reression to (T10) assessed up to 6 hours

The sensory block regression to (T10) dermatome

The onset of sensory block

Time Frame: From intrathecal injection until the onset of sensory block assessed up to 15 minutes

Comparing the onset of sensory blocks to T10 (10th thoracic dermatome) assessed by pinprick test.

The complete motor block

Time Frame: From intrathecal injection until the onset of complete motor block assessed up to 15 minutes

Time to complete motor block after intrathecal injection as assess using a modified Bromage scale

The full motor recovery

Time Frame: From intrathecal injection until the full motor recovery assessed up to 6 hours

Full motor recovery was defined as zero on the Bromage scale.

The Pain Score

Time Frame: The first 24 hours after spinal anesthesia

Using VAS (Visual Analogue Score) system

Time to first analgesic requirement

Time Frame: During first 24 hours after spinal anesthesia

Time to first analgesic requirement was measured from the time of spinal injection to the first time at which the patient complained of pain in the postoperative period

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mean Arterial Blood Pressure(First hour after spinal anesthesia)
  • Heart Rate(First hour after spinal anesthesia)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials