: SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE VERSUS EMPTY SOCKET TECHNIQUE

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Dental Implant Placement; Socket Shield Technique Implant Placement
• Interventions: Procedure: implant placement

• Registration Number: NCT02992366
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of socket shield technique compared with conventional immediate implant placement.

Detailed Description

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of socket shield technique compared with conventional immediate implant placement.

PICO

* P: patient require immediate dental implant placement for esthetic consideration

* I: socket shield technique

* C: conventional immediate implant placement

* O:

Outcome name Measuring device Measuring unit Primary outcome Vertical and horizontal bone level Cone beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) Millimeter Secondary outcome (a) Pocket probing depth Periodontal probe Millimeter Secondary outcome (b) Labial Alveolar crestal bone height compared with the lingual side Cone beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) Millimeter

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2016-12
• Study Start: 2016-12
• Study First Submitted: 2016-12-10
• Study First Submitted QC: 2016-12-10
• Last Update Submitted: 2016-12-10
• Study First Posted: 2016-12-14
• Last Update Posted: 2016-12-14
• Primary Completion: 2017-07
• Study Completion: 2017-12

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 20

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with remaining roots in the esthetic zone with intact periodontal condition indicated for extraction.
2. Physically able to tolerate conventional surgical and restorative procedures
3. Signing of an informed consent form
4. Implant insertion torque > 32 N cm with good primary stability

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

1. Systemic diseases contraindicating implant placement eg uncontrolled diabetes
2. Severe bruxism
3. Active infection in the teeth to be treated
4. Vertical root fractures with displacement in the teeth of the surgical area

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
conventional immediate implant (B)	implant placement	1. Following local anesthetic infiltration opposite to the root to be extracted non traumatic extraction of the tooth or remaining root by periotome. 2. The implant fixture will be inserted in the empty socket by conventional manner. primary closure will not be attempted as the patients will undergo immediate non-functioning provisionization.
socket shield (A)	implant placement	1. Following local anesthetic infiltration opposite to the root to be extracted the root is sectioned in a mesiodistal direction along its long axis as far apical as possible. 2. After sectioning the root into labial and palatal halves, the palatal half is removed with preservation of the labial root section. 3. The labial half is prepared to be Flushing or 1mm above the labial alveolar crest. Then thinned slightly to a concave contour in an apico-coronal and mesiodistal direction. 4. The implant will be inserted in place of the palatal half with the labial surface of the implant facing the labial root shield (root-implant interface) primary closure will not be attempted as the patients will undergo immediate non-functioning provisionization.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Vertical and horizontal bone level	9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Pocket probing depth	9 months
Labial Alveolar crestal bone height compared with the lingual side	9 months