Comparative Study Between Socket Shield Technique Versus Allograft Buccal Sheet Technique on Alveolar Bone Resorption After Immediate Implant Placement
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Bone Loss in Jaw
- Registration Number
- NCT06566001
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
22 patient where divided randomly into 2 groups : control group did dental implant utilizing socket shield , while study group did dental implant with allogenic bone graft there is no significant bone loss between the two groups after 4 month follow up
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 22
Inclusion Criteria
- patient has remaining root in upper anterior without lesion
Exclusion Criteria
periapical lesion under the tooth
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method measure bone loss by CBCT 4 month Measure bone loss by CBCT mm
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie alveolar bone resorption in the esthetic region following immediate implant placement?
How does the socket shield technique compare to allograft buccal sheet in preventing bone resorption in the esthetic zone?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict successful alveolar bone preservation with socket shield or allograft techniques?
What are the potential adverse events associated with socket shield and allograft buccal sheet procedures in dental implantology?
What combination therapies or alternative approaches are being explored alongside socket shield and allograft techniques for bone resorption prevention?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Cairo university
🇪🇬Giza, Egypt
Cairo university🇪🇬Giza, Egypt