Socket Preservation Procedure Studying Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes
- Conditions
 - Ridge PreservationBone Regeneration
 
- Registration Number
 - NCT03497403
 
- Lead Sponsor
 - Harvard School of Dental Medicine
 
- Brief Summary
 Two different surgical protocols for socket preservation were compared. Soft and hard tissue outcomes were measured clinically and radiographically at baseline and six months post operatively.
- Detailed Description
 The effect of different surgical techniques for socket preservation on soft tissue parameters has seldom been investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate One with a cross-linked membrane used in secondary intention healing and the other with a non-cross-linked membrane used in primary intentional healing. Thirty subjects requiring tooth extraction were randomly allocated to either control group C (allograft covered with a non-cross-linked collagen membrane with primary closure) or experimental group E (allograft covered with cross-linked collagen membrane left exposed). Sites were surgically re-entered at 6-months. Soft and hard tissue measurements, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and cast measurements were taken at baseline \& 6-months.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
 - COMPLETED
 
- Sex
 - All
 
- Target Recruitment
 - 30
 
- between 20-80 years of age
 - healthy with no conditions that could alter wound healing
 - requiring the extraction of a non-molar tooth with two neighboring teeth on either side and intact bony walls
 - a tooth requiring extraction that is treatment planned for implant placement
 - willing to participate in the study and sign the informed consent
 - willing to receive clinical exams, radiographs, surgery, two and six week post-operative exams and six month re-entry exam.
 
- systemic conditions which could alter wound healing
 - tooth anatomy requiring aggressive bone removal or greater flap reflection for extraction
 - severe local infection at extraction site
 - a tooth exhibiting severe resorption of buccal or lingual plates
 - absence of keratinized tissue buccal to the tooth to be extracted
 - severely reduced vestibular depth (≤ 3.0 mm) at the tooth to be extracted.
 
Study & Design
- Study Type
 - INTERVENTIONAL
 
- Study Design
 - PARALLEL
 
- Primary Outcome Measures
 Name Time Method Keratinized tissue width 6 months Keratinized gingival tissue width measured from the free gingival margin to the muco-gingival junction.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
 Name Time Method Keratinized tissue thickness 6 months Keratinized gingival tissue thickness measured with a needle and stopper 3mm from the free gingival margin.
CEJ-FGM 6 months The distance from the tooth's cervical enamel junction (CEJ) to the free gingival margin (FGM) was taken with a probe.
Ridge Width 6 months After the gum tissue is reflected, the width of the ridge 6mm from the crest was measured with a caliper.
Cast ridge width 6 months Dental impressions were taken and stone casts obtained from them.The ridge width was then measured with calipers.
Cast ridge volume 6 months Dental impressions were taken and stone casts obtained from them.The ridge volume was measured using an optical scanner.
Vestibular Depth 6 months The distance from the free gingival margin to the apical extent of the vestibule measured with a probe.
CEJ- Buccal crest 6 months The distance from the tooth's cervical enamel junction and the top of the buccal bone crest was taken with a probe.
CBCT bone height 6 months CBCT scans were taken and the alveolar ridge height was then measured.
CBCT bone width 6 months CBCT scans were taken and the alveolar ridge width was then measured.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
 Harvard School of Dental Medicine
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Harvard School of Dental Medicine🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
