Socket Preservation Using Autogenous Bone Graft Versus MPM
Phase 1
- Conditions
- Bone Graft; Complications
- Interventions
- Other: MPM(Mineralized plasmatic matrix).Other: Autogenous Bone Graft
- Registration Number
- NCT03008538
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
Studying the comparative effectiveness of socket preservation using autogenous bone graft versus MPM for implant insertion.
- Detailed Description
To assess bone quality, stability of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets of mandibular anterior and premorals augmented by MPM (Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix) versus autogenous bone graft (gold standard), at different follow-up periods (0, 3, 6, 9 months).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
- Medically free patients.
- Patients with mandibular anterior and premolar hopeless teeth indicated for extraction.
- Evaluated bone height on X.Ray to be (0-4 mm buccal bone dehiscence).
- Age between 18 and 40 years.
- Both sexes.
- Patients physically able to tolerate surgical and restorative procedures. Good oral hygiene.
- Highly motivated patients.
Exclusion criteria:
- Smokers.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- Presence of any pathosis in the pre-implant site.
- Presence of Para functional habits.
- History of oral radiotherapy.
- History of prolonged steroids use
- Psychological disorders.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Read More
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix MPM(Mineralized plasmatic matrix). MPM(Mineralized plasmatic matrix) insertion in extraction sockets for socket preservation for later implant placement and histomorphometric analysis. Autogenous Bone Graft (Gold Standards). Autogenous Bone Graft Socket preservation using Autogenous bone graft for later implant placement and histomorphometric analysis.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient Satisfaction regarding function, to be measured using patient questionnaire. 3 Months.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparative histomorphometric analysis, to be measured using a digital software called (leica QWin 500) and unit of measurements are to be (Pixels). 3 Months.