A Study to compare the Effect of closing the Hole in the Ear Drum using cartilage and fascia.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: H663- Other chronic suppurative otitis media
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/08/015343
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Shruthi Sreekumar
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.patients with anterior perforation,eustitian tube dysfunction,recurrent perforation
2.patients who are primary tympanoplasty cases with subtotal or large perforation.
3.patients diagnosed with CSOM Mucosal Type
4.patients with atleast 3 weeks dry period.
Exclusion Criteria
1.patients with active infection.
2.Unsafe type of CSOM
3.patients having discharge ear.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Post operative outcomes assesed <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>1)Epithelialisation Of Graft <br/ ><br>2)Graft Displacement <br/ ><br>3)Rinnes Test <br/ ><br>4)Webbers Test <br/ ><br>5)Perforation Closure <br/ ><br>6)Overall OutcomeTimepoint: Post operative assesments on <br/ ><br>1.8 th day <br/ ><br>2.15 th day <br/ ><br>3.30 th day <br/ ><br>4.45 th day <br/ ><br>5.60 th day <br/ ><br>6.75 th day <br/ ><br>7.90 th day
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Hearing improvement which is assessed by Pure Tone AudiometryTimepoint: 60 th Post Operative Day