Comparison of ease of intubation through I-gel versus Ambu Auragai
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/03/031714
- Lead Sponsor
- Government Medical College Patiala
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA physical status I/II
Age group 20-60 years
Exclusion Criteria
Anticipated difficult airway
History of gastroesophageal reflux disease
Any contraindications to use of muscle relaxants
Increased risk of aspiration
Oropharyngeal pathology
Poor lung compliance
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the efficacy of I-gel and AAG in terms of number of attempts taken for effective supraglottic airway device placement,time to achieve effective ventilation after supraglottic airway device placement,number of attempts for endotracheal intubation,intubating time and number of cases in which fiberoptic bronchoscope is requiredTimepoint: Time taken for supraglottic Airway Device(SAD) placement. <br/ ><br>Time taken for intubation through SAD. <br/ ><br>Total intubation time. <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare haemodynamics and complications with the use of I-gel and AAG as conduit for endotracheal intubationTimepoint: To compare haemodynamics with the use of I-gel and AAG as conduit for endotracheal intubation <br/ ><br>Vitals(Heart Rate,Blood pressure,Mean arterial pressure,sPO2,ETCO2) will be recorded till the end of surgery and recorded for every 1 minute for first 10 minutes and every 5 minutes for 30 minutes