Comparison between I-gel and endotracheal tube for assessing adequacy of respiration in children undergoing laparoscopic surgeries.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- healthy or with well controlled medical condition (ASA 1 AND 2)
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2017/05/008493
- Lead Sponsor
- Maulana azad medical college
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 80
Inclusion Criteria
1. Age 2 year to 8 years of either sex
2. ASA grade I and II children
3. Elective laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation
4. Estimated duration of surgery <=1 hour
Exclusion Criteria
1. Inability of the patientâ??s parents/guardian to understand the study or consent process.
2. Known/ predicted difficult airway
3. History of lung disease
4. Conditions with high risk of aspiration
5. Glottic or sub glottic airway obstruction
6. Obese children
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method I-gel is comparable to endotracheal intubation in terms of adequacy of ventilation (PECO2, minute ventilation and SpO2). However, increase of peak airway pressures is less with I-gel. Also post operative complications are fewer with I-gel.Timepoint: 1. After induction <br/ ><br>2. Before carboperitonem <br/ ><br>3. After carboperitoneum
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Haemodynamic responses elicited by each device were comparable and within normal limits and so was the rise in end tidal CO2. <br/ ><br>2. I-gel requires a slightly longer time for insertion than endotracheal tube in paediatric population. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1. After induction <br/ ><br>2. Before carboperitoneum <br/ ><br>3. After carboperitoneum