comparison of laryngeal airway devices in laproscopic gynecological procedures.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: N979- Female infertility, unspecifiedHealth Condition 2: N832- Other and unspecified ovarian cystsHealth Condition 3: N938- Other specified abnormal uterine and vaginal bleedingHealth Condition 4: N958- Other specified menopausal and perimenopausal disordersHealth Condition 5: N888- Other specified noninflammatory disorders of cervix uteri
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/09/036284
- Lead Sponsor
- DrBhavana
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA 1 AND 2
patients with mallampati 1 and 2
Exclusion Criteria
patients with anticipated difficult airway
h/o increased risk of regurgitation of gastric contents like full stomach , pregnancy, trauma , oesophageal motility disorders, intestinal obstruction.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ease of device insertion , number of insertion attempts and airway leak pressure between the LMAs are comparedTimepoint: intraoperative monitoring from the beginning of surgery i.e LMA insertion to end of surgeryi.e reversal and removal of LMA
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method nilTimepoint: nil