Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01796483
NCT01796483
Completed
N/A

Exploration électroencéphalographie et Pharmacologique Des Dysfonctionnements exécutifs Induits Par la Stimulation cérébrale Profonde du Noyau Sous-thalamique Dans la Maladie de Parkinson

Hospices Civils de Lyon1 site in 1 country37 target enrollmentOctober 2012

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Parkinson Disease
Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Enrollment
37
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
comparision placebo vs Clonidine
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) remarkably improves motor functions in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). However, growing evidence suggests that STN-DBS also causes executive inhibitory deficits and impulsive behaviour (Jahanshahi et al 2000; Schroeder et al 2002; Hershey et al 2004; Thobois et al 2007; Frank et al 2007; Ballanger et al., 2009). Despite a widespread use, the mechanisms of action of STN-DBS are still unclear. Two reasons might explain this. 1) From a theoretical point of view, cognitive models of executive control mechanisms are incomplete. 2) From a methodological point of view, investigating cerebral activity during STN-DBS is very limited because most techniques are incompatible with locally implanted electrodes.

This project relies on a double opportunity to answer these questions offered by recent theoretical and methodological advances. First, investigations in healthy subjects (Jaffard et al 2007, 2008, Boulinguez et al 2009) revealed an essential function of inhibitory control, so far ignored, consisting in locking in advance movement triggering processes to prevent undesired automatic or anticipated responses to unattended stimuli. In other words, key processes of executive control may act tonically before stimulation occurs, calling brain imaging studies to look at proactive and not only reactive activations. Second, recent advances in EEG signal processing now allow suppressing from the electroencephalogram DBS-related artifacts (Allen et al. 2010), providing a tremendous opportunity to use a non-invasive technique with the high temporal resolution necessary to disentangle proactive from reactive brain activity. To our knowledge, up to date no study has been published using EEG with STN-DBS patients since Allen et al.'s paper. The first operational purpose of this project is to identify the anatomo-functional origin of STN-DBS-induced executive dysfunction using EEG recordings in classical stimulus-response tasks. Results expected from this first part of the project may help resolving other long-lasting issues. Indeed, reactivity as assessed by simple reaction time in non-implanted patients as well as impulsivity in STN-DBS patients are known to remain insensitive to dopaminergic medication. Since the proactive activity related to executive, inhibitory, control may be supported by the noradrenergic (NA) system, the second purpose of this project is to test the original hypothesis according to which NA plays a central role in both akinesia and STN-DBS side effects.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2012
End Date
June 2016
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • For all right-handed participants :
  • Age between ≥ 40 and ≤ 70 years old ;
  • Weight between 45 and 95 kg
  • Without cognitive deterioration (MATTIS score \> 130) ;
  • Without orthostatic hypotension known;
  • Showing no contraindication to clonidine:
  • Hypersensibility known to clonidine or to an excipient of Catapressan
  • Depressed state
  • Severe bradyarrythmias due to a sinus node disease or atrioventricular block ventricular second or third degree ;
  • Treatment by sultopride;

Exclusion Criteria

  • For all the participants:
  • Having somatic medication treatment with a cerebral or psychic impact;
  • Presenting dependence and abuse to cannabis or to other addictive substance according to the DSM-IV-TR, with the exception of tobacco;
  • Already participating to another biomedical research except surgical project involving a new material of deep brain stimulation because in this case stimulation parameters and patients benefiting of it will be the same;
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women (diagnostic examination);
  • Subjects having, after reading questionnaires or after the medical examination, contraindication to EEG exam or to clonidine.
  • Specific to parkinsonian patients:
  • Having other neurologic or psychiatric associated pathology, notably depression;
  • Already participating to another biomedical research except surgical project involving a new material of deep brain stimulation because in this case stimulation parameters and patients benefiting of it will be the same;
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women (diagnostic examination); Subjects having, after reading questionnaires or after the medical examination, contraindication to EEG exam or to clonidine.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

comparision placebo vs Clonidine

Time Frame: Primary outcome data will be analyzed at the completion of the study, i.e. after the planned 18-month duration of data collection from patients and control subjects.

The primary outcome the study was designed to compare placebo vs clonidine effects on STN-DBS modulations of proactive inhibitory control using commission error rate as an index of impulsivity and reaction time as an index of akinesia

Secondary Outcomes

  • Localisation of the sources of activity(Secondary outcome data will be analyzed at the completion of the study, i.e. after the planned 18-month duration of data collection from patients and control subjects.)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials