跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02066051
NCT02066051已完成不适用

Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) and Meibomian Gland Expression to Treat Ocular Rosacea Secondary to Inactive Chronic Ocular Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Mayo Clinic2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 8 人开始时间: 2013年10月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
Mayo Clinic
入组人数
8
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of Participants Who Responded to Intense Pulsed Light (IPL)

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study was to see if Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) can be used safely and effectively to help treat dry eyes from ocular rosacea after chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Current treatment options for this disease are limited.

详细描述

Ocular rosacea and meibomian gland disease are major contributors to keratoconjunctivitis sicca after chronic GVHD. Rosacea exacerbates the aqueous deficiency caused by damage to lacrimal and accessory lacrimal glands similar to cholestasis damage in the biliary system.

Subjects who had inactive chronic GVHD after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and severe dry eye symptoms related to ocular rosacea were recruited and treated with 4 monthly sessions of IPL and meibomian gland expression. Their charts were reviewed prior to treatment to confirm quiescence of active systemic disease. Symptom scores were quantified with Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness questionnaire (SPEED2). Baseline complete eye exam was performed, and subjects received an eyes assessment score based on the Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Assessment and Scoring Form.

Symptoms, exam, and diagnostic data were obtained at baseline (month 0, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 4, month 5, month 6, month 9 and month 12). IPL treatment and meibomian gland expression was performed at baseline (month 0), month 1, month 2, and month 3.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 99 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Ocular rosacea with inactive GVHD

排除标准

  • Active GVHD
  • Facial laser treatment
  • Accutane exposure
  • Inability to wear sun protection factor (SPF) 30 sunscreen and avoid sun exposure
  • Inability to meet study requirements

结局指标

主要结局

Number of Participants Who Responded to Intense Pulsed Light (IPL)

时间窗: 12 months

Participants received treatment over 4 months and were monitored for safety and response for an additional 8 months. The symptoms were scored with the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED2) questionnaire. The SPEED questionnaire presents the four most commonly experienced dry eye symptom groups and asks patients to tick a box for all symptoms that apply to them. The frequency section ratings run from 0 (never) to 3 (constant), and the severity section ratings run from 0 (no problems) to 4 (intolerable), for a total score ranging from 0 (no problem) to 28 (severe problems). Over a 30% improvement in the SPEED2 score equated a response. None of the subjects were expected to get a complete response due to the nature of the damage to their ocular surface from GVHD.

次要结局

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events(12 months)

研究者

发起方
Mayo Clinic
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Joanne F. Shen, M.D.

Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology

Mayo Clinic

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

IPL and Meibomian Gland Expression to Treat Ocular... | 临床试验