Clinical Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light(IPL) Procedure in Dry Eye Patient
- Conditions
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Interventions
- Procedure: IPL
- Registration Number
- NCT04391907
- Lead Sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Brief Summary
Clinical efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light(IPL) procedure in dry eye patients with meibomian gland dysfunction prior to cataract surgery.
- Detailed Description
IPL procedure is a device used for symptom relief and treatment of dry eye syndrome caused by meibomian gland dysfunction in adults, and its safety and long-term effects have been confirmed. The purpose of this study is to determine whether this procedure before cataract surgery is effective in improving the symptoms of dry eye syndrome after cataract surgery.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- A patient at the age of 21 cataract surgery
- A patient has the visual potential of 20/25 or better in each eye after cataract removal
- Dry eye patient by meibomian gland dysfunction
- Written informed consent to surgery and participation in the study
- Eye damage, active eye infection
- Uncontrolled health problem
- Wear contact lens within one month
- Allergic reactions of fluorescein sodium or ophtalmic anesthetic
- Eye surgery and trauma in the last six months
- Eye disease, structural abnormality
- If there is a cause of vision loss other than cataracts
- Under 20/25 expect vision
- Under the age of 20 years of age
- Pregnant woman and lactating woman
- Medical conditions in which IPL is contraindicated
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description IPL group IPL Subject who have intense pulsed light (IPL) laser 2 twice 1-6 weeks before cataract surgery
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method TBUT 3 months tear break-up time
meibomian gland function score 3 months By expression of eyelid, scoring of expressibility and quality of meibum will be tested. Form of secretion predominantly secreted by the eight meibomian glands in the center of the lid was evaluated as follows. grade 0, clear meibum is easily expressed; grade 1, cloudy meibum is expressed with mild pressure; grade 2, cloudy meibum is expressed with more than moderate pressure; and grade 3, meibum cannot be expressed even with the hard pressure. Higher score means a worst outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method OSDI 3 months questionnaire to evaluate dry eye symptoms. OSDI grading (0 \~ 100) was as follows: normal (0-12 points), mild (13-22 points), moderate (23-32 points), or severe (33-100 points). Higher score means a worse outcome.
Corneal staining score 3 months Punctate epithelial erosion of cornea will be evaluated with standard classification system(NEI score, National Eye Institute score). It divides the cornea into five sections and assigns a value from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) to each section, based on the amount, size, and confluence of the PEE, for a maximum of 15 points. Higher score means a worse outcome.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Samsung Medical Center
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of