MedPath

Clinical Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light(IPL) Procedure in Dry Eye Patient

Not Applicable
Withdrawn
Conditions
Dry Eye Syndromes
Interventions
Procedure: IPL
Registration Number
NCT04391907
Lead Sponsor
Samsung Medical Center
Brief Summary

Clinical efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light(IPL) procedure in dry eye patients with meibomian gland dysfunction prior to cataract surgery.

Detailed Description

IPL procedure is a device used for symptom relief and treatment of dry eye syndrome caused by meibomian gland dysfunction in adults, and its safety and long-term effects have been confirmed. The purpose of this study is to determine whether this procedure before cataract surgery is effective in improving the symptoms of dry eye syndrome after cataract surgery.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  1. A patient at the age of 21 cataract surgery
  2. A patient has the visual potential of 20/25 or better in each eye after cataract removal
  3. Dry eye patient by meibomian gland dysfunction
  4. Written informed consent to surgery and participation in the study
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Eye damage, active eye infection
  2. Uncontrolled health problem
  3. Wear contact lens within one month
  4. Allergic reactions of fluorescein sodium or ophtalmic anesthetic
  5. Eye surgery and trauma in the last six months
  6. Eye disease, structural abnormality
  7. If there is a cause of vision loss other than cataracts
  8. Under 20/25 expect vision
  9. Under the age of 20 years of age
  10. Pregnant woman and lactating woman
  11. Medical conditions in which IPL is contraindicated

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
IPL groupIPLSubject who have intense pulsed light (IPL) laser 2 twice 1-6 weeks before cataract surgery
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
TBUT3 months

tear break-up time

meibomian gland function score3 months

By expression of eyelid, scoring of expressibility and quality of meibum will be tested. Form of secretion predominantly secreted by the eight meibomian glands in the center of the lid was evaluated as follows. grade 0, clear meibum is easily expressed; grade 1, cloudy meibum is expressed with mild pressure; grade 2, cloudy meibum is expressed with more than moderate pressure; and grade 3, meibum cannot be expressed even with the hard pressure. Higher score means a worst outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
OSDI3 months

questionnaire to evaluate dry eye symptoms. OSDI grading (0 \~ 100) was as follows: normal (0-12 points), mild (13-22 points), moderate (23-32 points), or severe (33-100 points). Higher score means a worse outcome.

Corneal staining score3 months

Punctate epithelial erosion of cornea will be evaluated with standard classification system(NEI score, National Eye Institute score). It divides the cornea into five sections and assigns a value from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) to each section, based on the amount, size, and confluence of the PEE, for a maximum of 15 points. Higher score means a worse outcome.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Samsung Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath