MedPath

A PHASE II PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-MASKED CONTROLLED STUDY ASSESSING THE SAFETY & EFFICACY OF RHPRG4 (450 µG/ML RECOMBINANT HUMAN PROTEOGLYCAN 4) COMPARED TO VEHICLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SJÖGREN'S RELATED DRY EYE DISEASE

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Sjögren's Syndrome
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT07118241
Lead Sponsor
Lubris Bio Pty Ltd
Brief Summary

rhPRG4-Sjögren's-002 is a prospective multi-center study conducted in Australia to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically-applied rhPRG4 in subjects with Sjögren's related Dry Eye Disease.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Have the ability to comprehend and provide a signed and dated consent form.
  2. Are 18-75 years at time of consent;
  3. Have been diagnosed with SS for at least 3 months prior to ICF;
  4. Have been using artificial tears as the only topical treatment of SS related dry eye for at least 30 days prior to Visit 1;
  5. Have been stably using systemic medications for at least one month prior to Visit 1;
  6. Have Global SANDE score ≥ 40;
  7. Average VAS score for typical symptoms of dry eye (dryness, foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, stick feeling, blurred vision and photophobia) ≥ 25 mm, none < 5 mm;
  8. Have Oxford corneal fluorescein staining grade of ≥ 1 and ≤ 2 in each eye (OD & OS both ≥ 1 and ≤ 2);
  9. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures, attend all scheduled clinic visits, and continue participation for the duration of the study.
  10. Ability to self-administer study medication and willingness to adhere to the medication regimen.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Are currently or have a history of any ocular or systemic disorder or condition other than dry eye that based on investigator judgment will interfere with the interpretation of the study results. Examples of ocular or systemic disorders or conditions include active ocular infection, conjunctivochalasis, superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis, limbal stem cell deficiency, allergic conjunctivitis, giant papillary conjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, anterior basement membrane dystrophies, neurotrophic keratitis, corneal dystrophy, exposure keratitis, moderate to severe blepharitis, ocular trauma, progressive or degenerative corneal conditions, uveitis, and systemic infection;

  2. Have used any topical ocular medications (other than artificial tears), therapeutic medical devices, or undergone ocular surgery within the 30 days prior to Visit 1. Topical ocular medications include cyclosporine, lifitegrast, corticosteroid eye drops, and autologous/serum. Therapeutic medical devices include trigeminal stimulation, meibomian glad warming (excepting at home masks) or expression, intense pulsed light, low level light therapy, etc. Ocular surgeries include laser or refractive surgical procedures, insertion of punctal or punctal cauterization;

  3. Are unwilling to forgo the use of topical medications (other than IMP and limited artificial tear use), medical devices or ocular surgery from Visit 1 through Visit 4.

  4. Have only one eye;

  5. Are unwilling to adhere to t.i.d. administration of vehicle during run-in;

  6. Are unwilling to limit the use of artificial tears to no more than 4 days during run-in;

  7. Have begun regularly using systemic compounds for SS or SS-related dry eye during the one month prior to Visit 1. Systemic compounds include omega-3 oil (fish oil, flaxseed oil, etc.), systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and biologics that based on investigator judgment will interfere with the interpretation of the study results.

  8. Are unwilling to maintain a stable regimen of systemic compound use during the duration of the study;

  9. Have known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the study or procedural medications;

  10. Have participated in another clinical study at the same time as the present study or within 30 days of Visit 1;

  11. Have a history of drug, medication or alcohol abuse or addiction;

  12. Are females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or post-menopausal for at least 1 year) who meet any one of the following conditions:

    1. are currently pregnant or,
    2. have a positive result on the urine pregnancy test at the Screening Visit or,
    3. intend to become pregnant during the entire course of and 30 days after the study treatment periods, or,
    4. are breast-feeding or,
    5. not willing to use highly effective birth control measures, such as: Hormonal contraceptives - oral, implanted, transdermal, or injected and/or mechanical barrier methods, during the entire course of and 30 days after the study treatment periods;
  13. Are males with a female partner of child bearing potential where:

    1. the male is not surgically sterilized or,
    2. where the male partner cannot provide information regarding the female partner's child bearing status or,
    3. where the child bearing status of the female partner does not meet that of Exclusion Criteria 12; however, the female partner of a male participant will not be required meet Exclusion Criteria 12b.
  14. Have a history of a serious physical or psychiatric disorder that, in the investigator's opinion, could prevent compliance with study procedures or affect study participation;

  15. Have any other surgical or medical condition or finding that in the opinion of the investigator would compromise the subject's safety or participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Vehicle ControlVehicle ControlPBS Based Vehicle Control
rhPRG4 450ug/mlRecombinant Human Proteoglycan 4rhPRG4 450ug/ml
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 by looking at the frequency of patients attaining complete resolution of total corneal staining with fluorescein (Oxford Scale) at Day 28From baseline to the end of treatment at day 28

To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 by looking at the frequency of patients attaining complete resolution of total corneal staining with fluorescein (Oxford Scale) at Day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of the severity of treatment-emergent adverse events for the study durationFrom baseline to day 28

To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of the severity of treatment-emergent adverse events for the study duration

To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of the change in BCVA over 28 daysFrom baseline to day 28

To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of the change in BCVA over 28 days

To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of signs evaluated by slit lamp examination (SLE) (Meibomian glands, Eyelid Erythema, Eyelid Oedema, Lashes, Conjunctiva Erythema, Lens, Iris, Anterior Chamber, Hyperemia, Corneal transparency & Corneal neoFrom baseline to day 28

To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of signs evaluated by slit lamp examination (SLE) (Meibomian glands, Eyelid Erythema, Eyelid Oedema, Lashes, Conjunctiva Erythema, Lens, Iris, Anterior Chamber, Hyperemia, Corneal transparency \& Corneal neovascularization)

To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of intraocular pressure (IOP)From baseline to day 28

To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of intraocular pressure (IOP)

To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the total VAS score for dryness, foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision and photophobia (anchors: none & severe) at Day 28From baseline to day 28

To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the total VAS score for dryness, foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision and photophobia (anchors: none \& severe) at Day 28

To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the Oxford staining score, both per eye and as a total score per subject compared to vehicle at Day 28From baseline to day 28

To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the Oxford staining score, both per eye and as a total score per subject compared to vehicle at Day 28

To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the SANDE score compared to vehicle at Day 28From baseline to day 28

To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the SANDE score compared to vehicle at Day 28

Trial Locations

Locations (6)

Sydney Eye Hospital

🇦🇺

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Univ of New South Wales

🇦🇺

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

OTA

🇦🇺

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Queensland University of Technology

🇦🇺

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

University of the Sunshine Coast

🇦🇺

Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia

University of Melbourne

🇦🇺

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Sydney Eye Hospital
🇦🇺Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Ghadeer Clinical Orthoptist
Contact
+61 2 9382 7286
ghadeer.algarawi@sydney.edu.au

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.