跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/04/066139
CTRI/2024/04/066139尚未招募2 期

Comparison of safety and efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Quadratus Lumborum Block for post operative analgesia in patients undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy A Randomized control trial

Dr Sniya1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2024年5月22日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Time duration of analgesia between Erector Spinae Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block using visual analogue score

研究概览

简要总结

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is one of the commonly done surgery for treating kidney stones. But the post operative pain is intense that it requires lot of analgesics. Especially in a patient with kidney disease these drugs should be used with caution. Hence nerve blocks were tried which provides commendable analgesia and thereby reducing analgesics consumption. Erector Spinae Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block are two techniques that provide excellent post operative analgesia for PCNL surgeries. Though they were individually studied and proved efficacy, they are not compared and studied adequately. So we designed this study to compare the safety and efficacy of these two techniques. Bupivacaine which is a long acting amide local anaesthetic will be used for giving blocks. We will be administering 0.25% BUPIVACAINE 20 ml in both of the techniques. The study population will be selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Those who fulfils the criteria will be eligible to participate in the study. The patient and attenders will be explained about the procedure and how to give response during the study. After obtaining consent participants will be recruited to study.

As per the plan of study,An experienced anaesthesiologist will be administering the block at the end of PCNL surgery,and he/she will be monitored for the next 24 hours for the duration of analgesia and also will be monitored for the complications. As the procedure is done under USG guidance,occurrence of complications is extremely minimal,however we will be prepared for the same. At the end of the study we hope we will be able to come to a conclusion whether ESPB or QLB provide better analgesia with fewer side effects and hence can be used for the improved patient care .

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Double

入排标准

年龄范围
20.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Adult age group 20 to 70 years ASA PS I II III Patients posted for elective PCNL.

排除标准

  • Age group below 20 years and above 70 years Patients with ASA PS IV BMI above 35 Patients with cognitive disability.

结局指标

主要结局

Time duration of analgesia between Erector Spinae Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block using visual analogue score

时间窗: 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 1.5 hours, 3 hours

次要结局

  • Time taken for first rescue analgesia(0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 1.5 hours, 2 hours)
  • Tramadol consumption in 24 hours hours(0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 1.5 hours, 2 hours)
  • Paracetamol consumption in 24 hours(0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 1.5 hours, 2 hours)

研究者

发起方
Dr Sniya
申办方类型
Other [self]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Sniya

Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验