Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05027321
NCT05027321RecruitingNot Applicable

Efficacy of Preparation in Self-Hypnosis by Anchoring Versus Conversational Hypnosis, Used Alone or Combined, in Patients Undergoing Breast Macrobiopsies: a Randomized Study

Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: October 11, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
change in anxiety score

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The incidence of breast cancer and its mortality are reduced thanks in particular to early detection.

Often performed after a screening test, stereotactic macrobiopsies are used to characterize abnormalities detected on mammography. This anxiety-inducing and painful examination leads to significant physiological and psychological modifications for these women who logically apprehend the realization of this act.

Faced with this observation, investigators wondered what could be done to improve the experience of the patients during this examination.

Investigators were interested in hypnosis because its effectiveness as a complementary practice has been validated by numerous studies with benefits on pain and stress management.

However, today, there are no convincing results confirming which hypnosis method would be the best to manage patients' anxiety and pain during this examination.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Sequential
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •aged 18 or over,
  • •referred to the medical imaging department of Saint-Joseph hospital for breast macrobiopsy,
  • •naive of any hypnosis,
  • •having given free, informed and written consent,
  • •being affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such scheme

Exclusion Criteria

  • •having a major hearing loss,
  • •suffering from identified mental or psychotic disorders,
  • •not understanding the French language,
  • •having already had hypnosis practices,
  • •having an ongoing pregnancy,
  • •being the subject of a safeguard measure

Arms & Interventions

Control

No Intervention

control

Preparation in Self-Hypnosis by anchoring

Experimental

1-hour consultation with a hypnopractor just before the examination

Intervention: Preparation in Self-Hypnosis by anchoring (Behavioral)

Conversational Hypnosis

Experimental

conversational hypnosis support during the examination by a radiology technician and a radiologist specifically trained

Intervention: Conversational Hypnosis (Behavioral)

Preparation in Self-Hypnosis by anchoring + Conversational Hypnosis

Experimental

1-hour consultation with a hypnopractor just before the examination and conversational hypnosis support during the examination by a radiology technician and a radiologist specifically trained

Intervention: Preparation in Self-Hypnosis by anchoring + Conversational Hypnosis (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

change in anxiety score

Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention, during the intervention, immediatly after the intervetion) and at 8 days

Score (from 20 to 80) measured on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for state anxiety (STAI-Y1), how respondent feels right now, at this moment. Total scores can be categorized into five levels: 1. \> 65 (very high), 2. from 56 to 65 (high), 3. from 46 to 55 (medium), 4. from 36 to 45 (low), 5. \< 35 (very low). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary Outcomes

  • staff examination experience(baseline (immediately after the intervention))
  • AE/SAE reporting(baseline (during the intervention, immediatly after the intervetion) and at 8 days)
  • Amount of nesthetic administered to the patiet during the procedure(baseline (immediately after the intervention))
  • Examination duration(baseline (immediately after the intervention))
  • change in anxiety score(baseline (pre-intervention, during the intervention, immediatly after the intervetion) and at 8 days)
  • patient examination experience(baseline (immediately after the intervention))
  • change in pain score(baseline (pre-intervention, during the intervention, immediatly after the intervetion) and at 8 days)
  • anxiety score(baseline (pre-intervention))

Investigators

Sponsor
Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials