Effects of Gum Chewing on Appetite and Digestion

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: The Alternate Hypothesis is That Increased Mechanical Stimulation Will Result in Stronger Satiation/Satiety and Reduced Energy Intake; The Null Hypothesis is That Food Rheology Will Have no Effect on These Indices; It is Hypothesized That the Effects of Mastication Will be Less Evident in Obese Compared to Lean Individuals

• Registration Number: NCT01070212
• Lead Sponsor: Purdue University

Brief Summary

One obvious property difference between energy-yielding beverages and solid foods is the oral mechanical processing required to prepare the two food forms for swallowing. Considerable human data are consistent with a contribution of mechanical stimulation to appetite suppression. However, no study has isolated this property and assessed its influence on ingestive behavior in humans. This is the aim of the present study. The null hypothesis is that food rheology will have no effect on these indices. The alternate hypothesis is that increased mechanical stimulation will result in stronger satiation/satiety and reduced energy intake. Further, it is hypothesized that the effects of mastication will be less evident in obese compared to lean individuals.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2010-02
• Study First Submitted: 2010-02-16
• Study First Submitted QC: 2010-02-16
• Study First Posted: 2010-02-17
• Primary Completion: 2012-01
• Study Completion: 2012-01
• Status Verified: 2023-12
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-12-11
• Last Update Posted: 2023-12-15

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

• body mass index 18 -25 or 30-35 kg/ m2 good health not initiating or terminating the use of medications reported to affect appetite or body weight during the proposed study period stable activity level (no deviation > 1X/wk @ 30 min/session) no eating disorder (score <20 of the Eating Attitude Test (EAT-26) no allergies to test foods. not glucose intolerant or diabetic (based on fasting blood glucose between 70-99mg/dl (3.9-5.5mmol/l as recommended by the American Diabetes Association.) no history of GI pathology and self-reported consumer of breakfast and lunch.

Exclusion Criteria

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: CROSSOVER

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Effects of mastication on appetite.	12 hours	Effects of varying chewing intensity on self-rated hunger, fullness, desire to eat and thirst.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Endocrine response	4 hours	Effects of varying chewing intensity on serum/plasma GLP-1, Ghrelin, CCK, Insulin.
Blood chemistries	4 Hours	Effects of varying chewing intensity on lipid profiles and glucose.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Purdue University; 🇺🇸 West Lafayette, Indiana, United States