Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04503473
NCT04503473
Completed
Not Applicable

Locomotor Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Indiana University1 site in 1 country17 target enrollmentAugust 1, 2020

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Sponsor
Indiana University
Enrollment
17
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Gait speed
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of two different walking training interventions on the recovery of strength, mobility, walking and other measures of health in individuals following traumatic brain injury. During this study, participants will aim to complete up to 15 training sessions over 4-5 weeks of each intervention with at least a 4 week break between interventions. Each training session will last approximately 1 hour, while testing sessions performed at the beginning and end of each intervention will last approximately 3-4 hours. Participation in this research study may last up to 6 months including screening and baseline testing. The possible benefits to participant from participation in this study include increased strength of the participants leg muscles and improved walking ability

Detailed Description

The primary goal of the proposed study is to identify the contributions of the amount of task-specific practice on locomotor (i.e., walking) recovery in patients with (\> 6 Months) traumatic brain injury (TBI). The investigator will do this by building on our previous work directed towards identifying the essential exercise training parameters that maximize locomotor recovery. Consistent with principles of motor learning and exercise physiology, the investigator contend that certain training (i.e., dosage) parameters of physical rehabilitation, including the type (specificity) and amount of task practice, are critical to mobility outcomes following neurological injury. Previous work suggests these training parameters may influence locomotor recovery in patients with other neurological disorders (i.e., stroke), although few studies have attempted to delineate similar contributions of amount of task-specific practice in neurologic injury. Indeed, no studies have carefully controlled these training parameters during physical rehabilitation of patients with neurologic injury, and such interventions are rarely utilized in the clinical setting. Reasons for these knowledge gaps from other rehabilitation studies to patients with neurologic injury or lack of clinical implementation are unclear, but may be due to adherence to traditional rehabilitation theories. One concern is that practicing only stepping tasks reduces attention towards hallmark physical impairments following neurologic injury, such as loss of strength or postural stability, which are considered primary determinants of decreased mobility. Only a few studies have addressed whether providing only structured stepping training can mitigate these impairments without their explicit practice, but not in the neurologic injury population. A related concern is that focused stepping training without significant attention towards impairments or gait quality may exaggerate altered movement strategies, which could be reinforced with repeated practice. However, there is little data to suggest "worsening" of abnormal gait patterns following high intensity training. Rather, recent findings suggest patients demonstrate more normal kinematics. If focused task specific (i.e., stepping) training is to be applied clinically, participant must delineate its contributions towards improving locomotor function, and their effects on underlying impairments and gait kinematics. Central hypotheses are that stepping training in TBI results in:1) greater locomotor gains as compared to non-specific interventions; 2) gains in selected impairments underlying gait dysfunction (i.e., strength and metabolic capacity and efficiency); and, 3) improvements in gait quality. To test these hypotheses, the proposed crossover, assessor-blinded, randomized clinical trial (RCT) is designed to test the effects of specificity of rehabilitation training applied early-post-stroke. In this RCT, patients \> 6 post-TBI will be allocated ≤ 15 sessions over approximately 4-5 weeks of high-intensity stepping training or conventional therapy. Importantly, training intensity will be held constant to account for this potential confounding factor. Blinded assessments will be performed prior to and following each training paradigm.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 1, 2020
End Date
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

George Hornby

Professor of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Indiana University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • \> 6 months post traumatic brain injury
  • 18-75 years old
  • ability to walk without physical assistance
  • Self selected walking speed of 0.01-1.0 m/s

Exclusion Criteria

  • \<18 years old
  • \>75 years old
  • self selected walking speed of \> 1.0 m/s
  • \< 3 months from botulinum toxin injection
  • Above the knee brace
  • Currently receiving physical therapy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Gait speed

Time Frame: Baseline 1, Post 6 weeks, Baseline 2, Post 6 weeks

Gait speed is valid, reliable, and sensitive measures related to overall functional ability, and will be assessed by blinded rates. This measure will be performed by blinded assessors who do not participate in the training. Gait speed will be measured at self-selected speeds (SSS; instructions to "walk at normal comfortable pace") and fastest-possible speed (FS: "as fast as you safely can") using the Zeno Walkway (Protokinetics, Haverton, PA).

Change in Endurance

Time Frame: Baseline 1, Post 6 weeks, Baseline 2, Post 6 weeks

Endurance is valid, reliable, and sensitive measures related to overall functional ability, and will be assessed by blinded rates. This measure will be performed by blinded assessors who do not participate in the training. Gait endurance will be tested using the 6MWT (m) with instructions similar to SSS to minimize fall risk.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in metabolic capacity(Baseline 1, Post 6 weeks, Baseline 2, Post 6 weeks)
  • Change in gait quality(Baseline 1, Post 6 weeks, Baseline 2, Post 6 weeks)
  • Change in Strength(Baseline 1, Post 1 after 6 weeks, Baseline 2, Post 6 weeks)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials