跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04503473
NCT04503473已完成不适用

Locomotor Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Indiana University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 17 人开始时间: 2020年8月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
17
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change in Gait speed

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of two different walking training interventions on the recovery of strength, mobility, walking and other measures of health in individuals following traumatic brain injury. During this study, participants will aim to complete up to 15 training sessions over 4-5 weeks of each intervention with at least a 4 week break between interventions. Each training session will last approximately 1 hour, while testing sessions performed at the beginning and end of each intervention will last approximately 3-4 hours. Participation in this research study may last up to 6 months including screening and baseline testing. The possible benefits to participant from participation in this study include increased strength of the participants leg muscles and improved walking ability

详细描述

The primary goal of the proposed study is to identify the contributions of the amount of task-specific practice on locomotor (i.e., walking) recovery in patients with (> 6 Months) traumatic brain injury (TBI). The investigator will do this by building on our previous work directed towards identifying the essential exercise training parameters that maximize locomotor recovery. Consistent with principles of motor learning and exercise physiology, the investigator contend that certain training (i.e., dosage) parameters of physical rehabilitation, including the type (specificity) and amount of task practice, are critical to mobility outcomes following neurological injury. Previous work suggests these training parameters may influence locomotor recovery in patients with other neurological disorders (i.e., stroke), although few studies have attempted to delineate similar contributions of amount of task-specific practice in neurologic injury. Indeed, no studies have carefully controlled these training parameters during physical rehabilitation of patients with neurologic injury, and such interventions are rarely utilized in the clinical setting. Reasons for these knowledge gaps from other rehabilitation studies to patients with neurologic injury or lack of clinical implementation are unclear, but may be due to adherence to traditional rehabilitation theories. One concern is that practicing only stepping tasks reduces attention towards hallmark physical impairments following neurologic injury, such as loss of strength or postural stability, which are considered primary determinants of decreased mobility. Only a few studies have addressed whether providing only structured stepping training can mitigate these impairments without their explicit practice, but not in the neurologic injury population. A related concern is that focused stepping training without significant attention towards impairments or gait quality may exaggerate altered movement strategies, which could be reinforced with repeated practice. However, there is little data to suggest "worsening" of abnormal gait patterns following high intensity training. Rather, recent findings suggest patients demonstrate more normal kinematics. If focused task specific (i.e., stepping) training is to be applied clinically, participant must delineate its contributions towards improving locomotor function, and their effects on underlying impairments and gait kinematics.

Central hypotheses are that stepping training in TBI results in:1) greater locomotor gains as compared to non-specific interventions; 2) gains in selected impairments underlying gait dysfunction (i.e., strength and metabolic capacity and efficiency); and, 3) improvements in gait quality. To test these hypotheses, the proposed crossover, assessor-blinded, randomized clinical trial (RCT) is designed to test the effects of specificity of rehabilitation training applied early-post-stroke. In this RCT, patients > 6 post-TBI will be allocated ≤ 15 sessions over approximately 4-5 weeks of high-intensity stepping training or conventional therapy. Importantly, training intensity will be held constant to account for this potential confounding factor. Blinded assessments will be performed prior to and following each training paradigm.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • > 6 months post traumatic brain injury
  • 18-75 years old
  • ability to walk without physical assistance
  • Self selected walking speed of 0.01-1.0 m/s

排除标准

  • <18 years old
  • >75 years old
  • self selected walking speed of > 1.0 m/s
  • < 3 months from botulinum toxin injection
  • Above the knee brace
  • Currently receiving physical therapy

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Gait speed

时间窗: Baseline 1, Post 6 weeks, Baseline 2, Post 6 weeks

Gait speed is valid, reliable, and sensitive measures related to overall functional ability, and will be assessed by blinded rates. This measure will be performed by blinded assessors who do not participate in the training. Gait speed will be measured at self-selected speeds (SSS; instructions to "walk at normal comfortable pace") and fastest-possible speed (FS: "as fast as you safely can") using the Zeno Walkway (Protokinetics, Haverton, PA).

Change in Endurance

时间窗: Baseline 1, Post 6 weeks, Baseline 2, Post 6 weeks

Endurance is valid, reliable, and sensitive measures related to overall functional ability, and will be assessed by blinded rates. This measure will be performed by blinded assessors who do not participate in the training. Gait endurance will be tested using the 6MWT (m) with instructions similar to SSS to minimize fall risk.

次要结局

  • Change in metabolic capacity(Baseline 1, Post 6 weeks, Baseline 2, Post 6 weeks)
  • Change in gait quality(Baseline 1, Post 6 weeks, Baseline 2, Post 6 weeks)
  • Change in Strength(Baseline 1, Post 1 after 6 weeks, Baseline 2, Post 6 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

George Hornby

Professor of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Indiana University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验