Comparison of the Clinical Performance of three airway devices(Ambu Auragain, Blockbuster and Protector laryngeal mask airway) in patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/11/059416
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care GMCH Chandigarh
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Age between 18 -60 years of either sex
2. Patients with American Society of
Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical status class I
II
3. Patients undergoing elective surgery requiring
controlled ventilation under general
anaesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with anticipated difficult airway( Airway Difficulty score >8)
2. Morbid obesity (BMI >35Kg/m2)
3. Pregnant women
4. Major maxilla-facial trauma or cervical spine pathology
5. Severe cardiorespiratory, cerebrovascular, renal, hepatic or musculoskeletal diseases
6. Severe coagulopathy or history of anticoagulant use
7. Patient at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease.
8. Surgery in prone position
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare oropharyngeal leak pressure of Ambu AuraGain, Blockbuster and Protector laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patientsTimepoint: To compare oropharyngeal leak pressure of Ambu AuraGain, Blockbuster and Protector laryngeal mask airway immediately and 5 minutes after successful insertion of the device which will be determined by presence of normal thoracoabdominal movement and a square wave capnograph on monitor while ventilating the patients.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method