Comparison of physical parameter with ultrasound parameters and intubating grading for predicting difficult intubation in patients posted for general anaesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/11/028853
- Lead Sponsor
- Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
>17 - 80 years of either sex
1.ASA physical status I, II,III
2. Patient undergoing elective surgeries under 3. General anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation
4. Valid informed/explained consent
Exclusion Criteria
Patients requiring rapid sequence intubation,
Patients with cervical spine pathology,
Patients scheduled for fibre optic tracheal intubation,
Uncooperative patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method When AASNI was compared to CL grading & ultrasound parameters it is was better comparable with Cormack Lehane grading for assessing difficult intubationTimepoint: 3months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method number of attemptsTimepoint: 3months