A comparison of keyhole surgeries vs traditional open surgeries for large intestinal cancers.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: C20- Malignant neoplasm of rectum
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/12/022416
- Lead Sponsor
- Rishabh Mehta
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All patients above the age of 18, admitted to Kasturba Hospital, histopathologically diagnosed with colorectal malignancy, planned for surgical resection.
Exclusion Criteria
All patients diagnosed to have colorectal malignancy, not planned for surgery (metastatic carcinoma, patient not fit for procedure, emergency procedure).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Circumferential margin (positive/negative) â?? <br/ ><br>2. Proximal margin (in cms) â?? <br/ ><br>3. Distal margin (in cms) â?? <br/ ><br>4. Number of lymph nodes retrieved (number) -Timepoint: 1 year 9 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Operating time (quantitative) â?? <br/ ><br>2. Volume of blood loss (quantitative) â?? <br/ ><br>3. Post-operative day of resumption of oral feeds (quantitative) â?? <br/ ><br>4. Duration of hospital stay (quantitative) â?? <br/ ><br>5. Cost of treatment (quantitative) â?? <br/ ><br>6. Incidence of surgical site infection (qualitative) â?? <br/ ><br>7. Need for stoma creation (qualitative) â?? <br/ ><br>8. Occurrence of anastomotic leak (qualitative ) â??Timepoint: 1 year 9 months