Frontal and Parietal Contributions to Proprioception and Motor Skill Learning
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Basic Science
- Sponsor
- Indiana University
- Enrollment
- 118
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Motor Skill
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to understand how the different regions of the brain affect our sense of limbs in space (proprioception) and in turn our hand movements (motor skill learning). This information might help us one day to generate better rehabilitation protocols to help patients with movement deficits.
Detailed Description
Moving our hands accurately, and learning new movement skills, depends on accurate sensory information. One of the sensory inputs which is crucial to make accurate movements is proprioception (sense of our limbs in space). Failure in estimating hand position results in inaccurate movement, raising the potential for accidents and injuries, but how the healthy brain carries out these functions, and how they could be strengthened in populations with sensory and motor deficits (e.g. stroke), is unknown. With greater understanding of these processes in the healthy brain, it may one day be possible to develop rehabilitation strategies that target a patient's unique mix of sensory and motor deficits. A robust way to identify whether a brain region plays a role in a behavior is to temporarily modulate its excitability in healthy people using non-invasive brain stimulation. This is commonly done in research with a short sequence of low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), also known as repetitive TMS (rTMS). rTMS is used clinically to treat conditions such as depression and is considered very low risk provided the generally accepted screening criteria are met. In the research setting, this technique is widely used not only in healthy adults (as in this study) but also in children and people with concussion, stroke, Parkinson's disease, and more. In separate groups of subjects, we will use rTMS over one of several brain regions of interest before the subject In separate groups of subjects, we will use a 40-second sequence of rTMS called continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over one of several brain regions of interest before the subject performs performs proprioceptive and skill learning tasks known to involve sensory and motor skill (learning). If performance of the task is affected by rTMS for a given group (relative to the sham, or control, group), it means that brain region plays some role in that type of proprioceptive or skill task.
Investigators
Hannah Justine Block
Associate Professor
Indiana University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Potential subjects must be between the ages of 18-45 years old and right-handed.
- •We will only test right-handed individuals.
- •We will only include individuals who report being free of Covid symptoms in week preceding testing.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Current vision problems, other than needing glasses or contacts.
- •Subjects will also be excluded if they currently suffer from frequent severe headaches, glaucoma, heart or respiratory disease, hypertension, psychiatric conditions, or learning or attention conditions.
- •They will also be excluded for current or past: visual, hearing, or balance impairments; stroke, seizure/epilepsy (including family history), or severe head trauma; fainting; or diabetes.
- •Subjects will be excluded for metal implants in the head other than titanium; cochlear implants; implanted neurostimulator; cardiac pacemaker; intracardiac lines; or a medication infusion device.
- •Because TMS does not penetrate deeply into the head, we cannot test subjects whose hair does not permit contact between the TMS coil and the scalp. We will therefore exclude subjects with dreadlocks, weaves, or hair extensions.
- •To protect the data from extraneous peripheral influences, we will also exclude subjects who have had serious injury to the bones, joints, or muscles of either hand or arm, and have not fully recovered. For the purpose of this study, "fully recovered" means they no longer notice any pain, weakness, or loss of sensation in the injured area, and have no mobility limitations.
- •For the validity of our data, we will exclude subjects taking medications or drugs that are known to affect cortical excitability and possibly seizure risk in an rTMS study. These medications/drugs are (Rossi et al., 2009): imipramine, amitriptyline, doxepine, nortriptyline, maprotiline, chlorpromazine, clozapine, foscarnet, ganciclovir, ritonavir, amphetamines, cocaine, (MDMA, ecstasy), phencyclidine (PCP, angel's dust), ketamine, gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), theophylline, mianserin, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, citalopram, reboxetine, venlafaxine, duloxetine, bupropion, mirtazapine, fluphenazine, pimozide, haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, risperidone, chloroquine, mefloquine, imipenem, penicillin, ampicillin, cephalosporins, metronidazole, isoniazid, levofloxacin, cyclosporin, chlorambucil, vincristine, methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, BCNU, lithium, anticholinergics, antihistamines, sympathomimetics.
- •Participants will also be excluded if they have metallic, mechanical, or magnetic implants; are claustrophobic, or are unable to remain still for long periods of time; or use an intra-uterine device (IUD) whos MR compatibility has not been established.
- •Women who are pregnant or think they might be pregnant will also be excluded, as effects of fMRI on the unborn are not known.
- •People who have a BMI over 30 will be excluded as it may be uncomfortable or impossible to lay in the MRI scanner.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Motor Skill
Time Frame: Assessed 4 times during the 2-hour main session: Pre-cTBS ("Pre"), immediately post-cTBS ("Post1"), after 40 trials of maze-tracing practice ("Post2"), and after 80 trials of maze-tracing practice ("Post 3").
Assessed by measuring movement accuracy on a maze-tracing task. Accuracy is defined by percent of movement path that falls within the maze. Participants traced the maze 10 times at 3 different speed ranges. Overall performance accuracy was taken as the mean accuracy across the three speed ranges. A change in mean accuracy reflects learning.
Proprioception
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 timepoints during the 2-hour main session: pre-cTBS ("Pre") and post-cTBS ("Post").
Two-alternative forced choice task where the robot moves the participant's hand in two different positions, and the participant reports whether second position was closer or further than first position. This data is fitted with a logistic regression relating the distance between the two positions and the likelihood that participant reports "further". The outcome measure is the distance at which the participant is equally likely to say "closer" or "further"; this is defined as the point of subjective equality, which indexes proprioceptive accuracy. If the number is small (close to zero), it means the person has high proprioceptive accuracy. If the number is large, it means the person is less accurate.