Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Facial Telangiectasia in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Facial Telangiectasia in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
• Interventions: Procedure: Intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment

• Registration Number: NCT04717583
• Lead Sponsor: Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Brief Summary

This clinical trial intends to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) in the treatment of facial telangiectasia in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Detailed Description

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can involve multiple organs and systems. The treatment for SLE mainly depends on long-term use of glucocorticoids. For many patients with SLE, facial telangiectasia is a commonly seen side effect of long-term use of glucocorticoids. Featured by facial erythema with or without flushing or burning sensation, facial telangiectasia seriously affects the quality of life of patients. However, up to now, there has been little attention paid to this condition in SLE patients. There have been a lack of effective treatment options for tackling this problem.

Intense pulsed light (IPL) is a non-laser light source used to treat a variety of vascular and pigmented lesions. Unlike ultraviolet that is harmful to patients with SLE, application of IPL may be a safe and effective treatment for SLE patients with facial telangiectasia. This study intends to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IPL in the treatment of facial telangiectasia for SLE patients that has been treated with long-term corticosteroids.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2021-01-17
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-01-17
• Study First Posted: 2021-01-22
• Study Start: 2021-02-01
• Status Verified: 2021-05
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-05-15
• Last Update Posted: 2021-05-18
• Primary Completion: 2022-07
• Study Completion: 2022-12

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 20

Inclusion Criteria

• 1. Age: between 18 and 65 years; 2. Patients definitedly diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus according to "Diagnostic Criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus"; 3. Patients receiving continuous treatment of glucocorticoid in the last 4 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria

• 1. Patients with severe diseases of heart, brain, lungs, liver, kidney, or blood system; 2. Patients with drug abuse, alcohol abuse, or mental disorders that are unable to cooperate or adhere to treatment; 3. Pregnant women, lactating women or women who are ready to conceive within 6 months; 4. Participated in other clinical trials within 3 months before the screening.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
IPL-treated side	Intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment	For each participant, the two sides of face will be randomized into an IPL-treated side and a control side. In the first 3 visits, the IPL-treated side of the face will be treated with IPL, once every 4 weeks for 3 consecutive times.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change of Five-Point Telangiectasia Scale after three times of IPL treatment	12 weeks	Five-Point Telangiectasia Scale will be used to assess improvement of telangiectasia and erythema. The range of TGS is 1 to 5, where 1 means less than 5% clearance, 2 means 5-25% clearance, 3 means 25-50% clearance, 4 means 50-75% clearance, and 5 means 75-100% clearance, compared to baseline before IPL treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change of Five-Point Telangiectasia Scale after 4, 8, and 24 weeks, respectively.	4, 8, and 24 weeks	Five-Point Telangiectasia Scale will be used to assess improvement of telangiectasia and erythema. The range of TGS is 1 to 5, where 1 means less than 5% clearance, 2 means 5-25% clearance, 3 means 25-50% clearance, 4 means 50-75% clearance, and 5 means 75-100% clearance, compared to baseline before IPL treatment.
Change of Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) scores after a 4-, 8-, 12- and 24-week treatment, respectively.	4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks	Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) scores describe the severity of facial erythema, ranging from 0-4. In CEA scoring system, 0=clear, and 4=severe.
Change of Patient Global Assessment (PGA) after a 4-, 8-, 12- and 24-week treatment, respectively.	4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks	PGA refers to the subject's global assessment of the facial telangiectasia condition. Change of PGA from baseline to post-treatment will be determined.
Change of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores after a 4-, 8-, 12-, and 24-week of treatment, respectively.	4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks	Change of DLQI from baseline to post-treatment will be determined.
Change of Skindex-16 scores after a 4-, 8-, 12- and 24-week of treatment, respectively.	4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks	Change of Skindex-16 from baseline to post-treatment will be determined.
The safety evaluation about the adverse reactions throughout the entire study process.	4, 8, 12, 16, and 36 weeks	The possible adverse reactions of IPL include rash, pain, short-term pigmentation, recurrence of telangitic erythema, recurrence or aggravation of SLE
Change of SLEDAI scores after 12 and 24 weeks, respectively	12 and 24 weeks	SLEDAI reflects the disease activity of SLE. A dramatic increase of SLEDAI during the IPL treatment or immediately after IPL treatment will be considered as an adverse event.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; 🇨🇳 Changsha, Human, China