Randomized Study for the Optimal Treatment of Symptomatic Patients With Low Gradient Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
- Interventions
- Other: strict clinical surveillanceProcedure: aortic valve replacement
- Registration Number
- NCT03667365
- Lead Sponsor
- Rennes University Hospital
- Brief Summary
According to current European Recommendations on valvular heart disease (VHD), "classical" severe aortic stenosis (AS) is defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm2 and indexed AVA ≤0.6 cm2/m2, a mean aortic pressure gradient (MAG) \>40 mmHg, and a maximal aortic velocity \>4 m/sec.
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended (class I indication) in patients with "classical" severe AS who have any symptoms related to aortic valve disease.
In 2007, Hachicha et al. described a particular pattern of severe AS, characterized by an AVA ≤0.6 cm2/m2, low mean pressure aortic gradient (MAG \<40 mmHg), despite the presence of a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%). This pattern of AS is encountered in nearly 15-25 % of patients who have severe AS. Typically, these patients are elderly subjects, with several comorbidities, a small left ventricular (LV) cavity with pronounced LV concentric remodeling and a restrictive physiology, leading to a decrease in LV stroke volume despite a preserved LVEF. The diagnosis and management of patients with low gradient severe AS and preserved LVEF are often challenging because:
1. the presence of a "true" severe aortic stenosis should be carefully confirmed by a multi-modality imaging approach;
2. the best therapeutic management (AVR versus conservative strategy) of symptomatic patients with low gradient severe AS and preserved LVEF is not clearly established.
In very recently updated European guidelines on the management of VHD, symptomatic patients with low gradient and low flow severe AS and preserved LVEF have only a class IIa-level C indication for AVR. No specific indications are given for the management of symptomatic patients with low gradient and normal flow severe AS. This lack of indications is clearly attributed to a gap in knowledge which requires further investigations to be filled up.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 52
- Age >18 years
- Symptomatic and severe AS defined by an effective AVA ≤1 cm² and indexed AVA ≤0.6 cm2/m2
- LVEF ≥50%
- MAG <40 mm Hg (measure confirmed by the multi-window continuous-wave Doppler interrogation and use of Pedoff probe)
- Confirmation of the presence of severe AS at DSE and MDCT aortic calcium score
- Feasibility of AVR by surgery or TAVR according to the "heart team"
- Signature of an informed consent
- Uncontrolled atrial of ventricular arrhythmias
- Patient having a life expectancy <1 year, independently from their aortic pathology
- Coronary artery disease necessitating a percutaneous or surgical revascularisation
- Presence of a concomitant valve disease needing surgical treatment
- Patient who are included in another research protocol
- Protected person (adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship or supervision), person deprived of their liberty, pregnant woman, lactating woman and minor)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description strict clinical surveillance strict clinical surveillance - aortic valve replacement aortic valve replacement -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method time from randomization to first occurrence of any of the components of the composite outcome (adjudicated): all-cause mortality or cardiovascular related hospitalization during 2 years follow-up
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method rate of cerebrovascular events 2 years rate of all-cause mortality 2 years rate of cardiovascular related hospitalization 2 years NT-proBNP plasma levels 6, 12, 18 and 24 months quality of life score 6, 12, 18 and 24 months test EQ-5D
rate of cardiovascular mortality 2 years walking distance 6, 12, 18 and 24 months 6-minute walking test
Trial Locations
- Locations (18)
CHU Liège
🇧🇪Liège, Belgium
CHU Brest - Hôpital La Cavale Blanche
🇫🇷Brest, France
APHM - Hôpital La Timone
🇫🇷Marseille, France
CH Bretagne Atlantique - Site de Vannes
🇫🇷Vannes, France
CHU Amiens - Picardie
🇫🇷Amiens, France
CHU Angers
🇫🇷Angers, France
APHP - CHU Henri Mondor
🇫🇷Créteil, France
CHU Lille
🇫🇷Lille, France
CHU Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand
🇫🇷Dijon, France
CH Bretagne Sud
🇫🇷Lorient, France
CHU Nantes
🇫🇷Nantes, France
Clinique du Millénaire
🇫🇷Montpellier, France
CHU Rennes
🇫🇷Rennes, France
CH Saint-Brieuc
🇫🇷Saint-Brieuc, France
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
🇫🇷Saint-Denis, France
CHU Tours - Hôpital Trousseau
🇫🇷Tours, France
CHU Nancy
🇫🇷Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
CHU Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil
🇫🇷Toulouse, France