MedPath

Tinidazole Versus Cefazolin Antibiotic Prophylaxis of Vaginal and Abdominal Hysterectomy

Not Applicable
Conditions
Hysterectomy
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00787553
Lead Sponsor
University of Campinas, Brazil
Brief Summary

Purpose: to compare the efficacy of tinidazole and cefazolin on the prophylaxis of the febrile and infectious morbidity after vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy. Methods: A randomized clinical trial carried out at the Women's Integrated Healthcare Center (CAISM)/UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil. Women undergoing to total vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy were randomly enrolled into one of these three groups of antibiotic prophylaxis: tinidazole, cefazolin or an association of both.

Detailed Description

A randomized clinical trial carried out at the Women's Integrated Healthcare Center (CAISM)/UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil, to compare the efficacy of tinidazole and cefazolin on the prophylaxis of the febrile and infectious morbidity after vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy. Women undergoing to total vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy were randomly enrolled into one of these three groups of antibiotic prophylaxis: tinidazole, cefazolin or an association of both.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
75
Inclusion Criteria
  • women undergoing to hysterectomy due to non-oncologic causes
Exclusion Criteria
  • previous pelvic infection
  • antibiotic use within 7 days before surgery
  • study drugs allergy
  • immuno-incompetence
  • urinary tract infection

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
cefazolin plus tinidazolecefazolin plus tinidazole-
cefazolincefazolin-
tinidazoletinidazole-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Post-operative infectionone month after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Campinas

🇧🇷

Campinas, SP, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath