Comparison of an Non-ablative Fractional 1565nm vs. an Ablative 2940-nm Fractional Er Laser for the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia
- Conditions
- Androgenetic Alopecia
- Interventions
- Device: non-ablative fractional 1565nm
- Registration Number
- NCT06218498
- Lead Sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
- Brief Summary
Laser sources have established their potential effect in inducing hair regrowth. No study has compared the effect of ablative fractional 2940-nm erbium yttrium aluminum garnet (Er: YAG) laser and non-fractional 15650nm fractional laser in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA).
- Detailed Description
The investigators performed a prospective study between to compare the efficacy and safety of ablative fractional 2940-nm erbium yttrium aluminum garnet (Er: YAG) laser and non-fractional 15650nm fractional laser in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA). The efficacy of the two therapies was evaluated by the investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores and the patient's Likert satisfaction scale at week 12 and week 24. Changes in total, terminal and villous hair count, total and terminal hair diameter, and AGA grade were also recorded. Adverse events were evaluated at each follow-up.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 135
- age between 18 and 65 years;;
- clinical diagnosis of AGA;
- AGA diagnosis was evaluated following Norwood Hamilton grade II-V criteria;
- no previous laser treatments for AGA in the past six months before enrollment;
- willingness to provide pictures and follow-up studies.
- if presented with severe diseases of internal organs, eyes, or skin;
- inflammation, infection, or unhealed wounds on the skin around the site of treatment on the head;
- systematic treatment with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressants and immunomodulators in the past 3 months
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 5% minoxidil 5% Minoxidil - non-ablative fractional 1565nm non-ablative fractional 1565nm -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method TAHC week 24 Use the trichoscopy to assess the changing number of non-vellus hairs in the target area .
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method IGA week 8, week 12, week 16, week 24, week 36 Investigator's Global Assessment. IGA was evaluated using a 7-point scale as follows: -3= obvious reduction of hair; -2= moderate reduction of hair; -1= mild reduction of hair; 0= change; 1= mild growth of hair; 2= moderate growth of hair; 3= obvious growth of hair.
Grade of Norwood-Hamilton week 12, week 24, week 36 The Grade of Norwood-Hamilton Classification
HGQA week 8, week 12, week 16, week 24, week 36 Hair growth questionnaire assessment
TAHC week 8, week 12, week 20, week 36 Use the trichoscopy to assess the changing number of non-vellus hairs in the target area
TAHW week 8, week 12, week 16, week 24, week 36 Use the trichoscopy to assess the changing diameter of non-vellus hairs in the target area
SSA week 8, week 12, week 16, week 24, week 36 Subject self-assessment. SSA was evaluated using a 7-point scale as follows: -3= obvious reduction of hair; -2= moderate reduction of hair; -1= mild reduction of hair; 0= change; 1= mild growth of hair; 2= moderate growth of hair; 3= obvious growth of hair.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
🇨🇳Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China