Study Evaluating the Impact of Mesh Pore Size on Chronic Pain After Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
- Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
- Interventions
- Device: Optilene LP meshDevice: Ultrapro mesh
- Registration Number
- NCT02500056
- Lead Sponsor
- Tartu University Hospital
- Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to determine whether usage of mesh with larger pores, compared with mesh with smaller pores, would result in decreased rate of chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair.
- Detailed Description
The aim of the present study is to determine whether usage of mesh with larger pores, compared with mesh with smaller pores, would result in decreased rate of chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair. The patients are randomized into two study gropus receiving mesh with different pore size. Clinical follow-up examination will be performed 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 3 years after the operation.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 143
- age ≥18 years
- unilateral primary reducible inguinal hernia
- elective operation
- consent to participate in the study.
- age <18 years
- irreducible
- strangulated
- recurrent hernia
- inability to understand the questionnaire
- unwillingness to participate in the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description OM group Optilene LP mesh Optilene LP mesh UM group Ultrapro mesh Ultrapro mesh
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Chronic Pain 6-month follow-up On visual analogue scale pain measurement at rest, on coughing, when rising from lying to sitting and during physical effort and exercise
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Chronic Pain 3-year follow-up On visual analogue scale pain measurement at rest, on coughing, when rising from lying to sitting and during physical effort and exercise
Foreign Body Feeling 6-month follow-up The question about foreign body feeling was a yes-or-no question