The anesthetic effectiveness of mandibular buccal infiltration with articaine compared to mandibular block anesthesia with lidocaine in pulpotomy of second primary molars.

Investigator0 个研究点目标入组 46 人开始时间: 待定最近更新: 2018年2月22日

适应症

试验速览

暂无简介。

•5-8 years old subject (Children under 5 years will be excluded from trial because of problem in communication and differentiation between pain and other negative reaction. children older than 8 years will be excluded because of possible physiologic root resorption); Children that consider as cooperative in pre-study visit (According to frankle scale for behaviors classified as Class 3: child is cooperative, but somewhat reluctant/ shy; Class 4: child is completely cooperative and even enjoys the experience); Two mandibular primary second molars that needs pulpotomy treatment; No history of allergic reaction to local anethetics and sulfites; No systemic disease that don not let the dentist treat under local aneshtesia; No pain killer taken for at least 24 hour before treatment.
•Exclusion criteria: subjects did not satisfy the inclusion criteria; History of spontaneous or nocturnal pain; gingival abscess or sinus tract; Radiographic sign of PDL widening, reduction in supporting bone density, furcation radiolucency or pathologic root resorption.

发起方

Investigator