Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/IRCT2015042321484N2
IRCT2015042321484N2
Completed
Phase 3

The anesthetic effectiveness of mandibular buccal infiltration with articaine compared to mandibular block anesthesia with lidocaine in pulpotomy of second primary molars.

Investigator0 sites46 target enrollmentTBD

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
ocal anaesthesia.
Sponsor
Investigator
Enrollment
46
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Investigator

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 5\-8 years old subject (Children under 5 years will be excluded from trial because of problem in communication and differentiation between pain and other negative reaction. children older than 8 years will be excluded because of possible physiologic root resorption); Children that consider as cooperative in pre\-study visit (According to frankle scale for behaviors classified as Class 3: child is cooperative, but somewhat reluctant/ shy; Class 4: child is completely cooperative and even enjoys the experience); Two mandibular primary second molars that needs pulpotomy treatment; No history of allergic reaction to local anethetics and sulfites; No systemic disease that don not let the dentist treat under local aneshtesia; No pain killer taken for at least 24 hour before treatment.
  • Exclusion criteria: subjects did not satisfy the inclusion criteria; History of spontaneous or nocturnal pain; gingival abscess or sinus tract; Radiographic sign of PDL widening, reduction in supporting bone density, furcation radiolucency or pathologic root resorption.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials