IRCT20220129053868N1
Recruiting
未知
Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine compared to Block Injection with 2% Lidocaine for Extraction of Mandibular Primary Molars
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Anesthetic efficacy for extraction of mandibular primary molars.
- Sponsor
- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
- Enrollment
- 100
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Having Mandibular Primary Molars that required extraction
- •medically fit(ASA I,II)
- •Mentally capable of communication
- •A good understanding of Persian
- •Having no history of pain or infection (abscess) or swelling
Exclusion Criteria
- •Medically and mentally compromised children
- •History of significant behaviour management problems
- •Evidence of infection or abscess near the proposed injection site
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
To Compare 2LA in dentistryCTRI/2022/06/043611SGT University
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Effect of one injection during removal of tooth/teeth of upper jawCTRI/2019/12/022334Dr Monalisa
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of action of anaesthesia of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine during extraction of upper jaw molars in elderly adults with severe toothacheHealth Condition 1: M268- Other dentofacial anomaliesCTRI/2023/04/051359Military Dental Centre
Recruiting
Phase 1
Comprison of anesthetic efficacy of Buccal Infilteration versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve block for Pulpotomy in Mandibular Second Primary Molars in sedated patientsanesthetic efficacy.IRCT20190313043046N2Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences30
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Clinical Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve BlockRestorative Dental Treatment by Buccal Infiltration AnaesthesiaNCT06353815Cairo University44