Comparison in the anesthetic efficacy of buccal, buccal plus palatal infiltration of 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine buccal infiltration in vital symptomatic maxillary molars: a prospective double blind randomized clinical trial.

Department of Oral Health Science Centre0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD

Overview

Phase: 未知
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Not specified
Sponsor: Department of Oral Health Science Centre
Status: Not yet recruiting
Last Updated: 4 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry

who.int

Start Date

TBD

End Date

TBD

Last Updated

4 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor

Department of Oral Health Science Centre

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•The inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: moderate to severe pain in the maxillary first molar, a prolonged response to cold testing with an ice stick and an electric pulp tester (Kerr Pulp Tester; Analytic Technology Corp, Redmond, WA), the absence of any periapical radiolucency on radiographs except for a widened periodontal ligament, a vital coronal pulp on access opening, and the ability of the subject to understand the use of pain scales. The subjects were in good health, and none were taking any medication that would alter pain perception, as determined by oral questioning and a written questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria

•The exclusion criteria for the study were as follows: subjects younger than 18 years of age or older than 50 years of age, any known sensitivity to either 2% lidocaine or 4% articaine or epinephrine, patients having active pain in more than 1 maxillary molar, subject taking any pain\-relieving medication including over\-the\-counter analgesics at least 12 hours before enrollment in the study, and swelling near the tooth in question and having a tooth not suitable for simple restorative treatment because of extensive caries or periodontal problems.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Completed

Not Applicable

Comparison of Articaine with Lignocaine for extraction of maxillary teeth

CTRI/2018/01/011239Vikas Sandilya Self100

Recruiting

Phase 1

Comprison of anesthetic efficacy of Buccal Infilteration versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve block for Pulpotomy in Mandibular Second Primary Molars in sedated patientsanesthetic efficacy.

IRCT20190313043046N2Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences30

Completed

Not Applicable

Comparative efficacy of various topical anesthetics during dental injection in pediatric patientsDental painOral Health

ISRCTN11021678Damascus University45

Completed

Phase 3

Articaine efficacy in primary second molar anesthesiaocal anaesthesia.Local anaesthetics

IRCT2015042321484N2Investigator46

Completed

Phase 2

Comparison of the effect of two different anesthetics on palatal tissue numbness in childreThe amount of pain during tooth extraction.

IRCT20180220038801N1Zahedan University of Medical Sciences44