IRCT20180220038801N1CompletedPhase 2
Comparison of palatal anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in buccal infiltration of maxillary first primary molar.
Zahedan University of Medical Sciences0 sites44 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 44
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 6 years to 8 years (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Need of bilateral maxillary molars extraction
- •Patient cooperation
Exclusion Criteria
- •Systemic disease
- •Mental retardation
- •History of previous dentistry treatment
- •Allergy to Anesthetic medicine
- •Abcess in location
Investigators
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Phase 4
A clinical study to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of two types of local anesthetic agents during root canal treatment of symptomatic toothCTRI/2024/05/067798Guru Nanak Institute of Dental Sciences and Research
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Clinical Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve BlockRestorative Dental Treatment by Buccal Infiltration AnaesthesiaNCT06353815Cairo University44
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of the anaesthetic effects of 4% articaine hydrochloride and 2% lidocaine hydrochloride for maxillary molar extraction: A randomised trialPACTR201802003023333Dr Adigun Olufemi Ibraheem14
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
To Compare 2LA in dentistryCTRI/2022/06/043611SGT University
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Is combination of buccal plus palatal injection better than the buccal alone during the endodontic treatment of maxillary molars using 2% lidocaine and 4articaine with same adrenaline concentration- A clinical studyCTRI/2021/05/033659Department of Oral Health Science Centre