MedPath

Comparison of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus Jet Nebulizer in the Pediatric Asthma Patient

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Asthma
Interventions
Device: Jet Nebulizer
Device: Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer
Registration Number
NCT02774941
Lead Sponsor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes related to the current practice of using a jet nebulizer (JN) with aerosol mask (AM) or mouthpiece (MP) versus a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with a valved-mask (VM) or MP in the treatment of acute moderate to severe asthma in Children's Medical Center Dallas Emergency Department (CMCED).

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes related to the current practice of using a jet nebulizer (JN) with aerosol mask (AM) or mouthpiece (MP) versus a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with a valved-mask (VM) or MP in the treatment of acute moderate to severe asthma in Children's Medical Center Dallas Emergency Department (CMCED). The investigators hypothesize that using the combination of a VMN and VM or MP will result in fewer hospital admissions and decrease length of stay in CMCED when compared to the current practice of using a JN and AM or MP.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
220
Inclusion Criteria

2 to 18 year old (up to 19th birthday) otherwise healthy children with primary diagnosis of acute moderate to severe exacerbation of asthma presenting to Children's Medical Center Emergency Department, Dallas

Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Children < 2 years old
  • Children with comorbid/complex medical conditions such as: congenital or acquired cardiovascular disease, cystic fibrosis, chronic lung disease (other than asthma), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, airway anomalies (e.g., tracheomalacia) or immunodeficiency syndromes.
  • Patients with coexisting medical condition such as pneumonia
  • Patients in impending respiratory failure as determined by treating physician
  • Patients that have had oral corticosteroids within 24hrs of CMCED admission
  • Patients that have had bronchodilator treatment within one hour of CMCED admission
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ControlJet NebulizerStandard single patient-use small volume JN (AirLife™ Sidestream® High-Efficiency Nebulizer, CareFusion, Yorba Linda, CA)
StudyVibrating Mesh NebulizerVibrating Mesh Nebulizer (Aerogen® Solo with Ultra adapter, Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Subjects HospitalizedWithin emergency department visit time frame (no more than 12 hours)

The primary outcome measure is rate of hospitalization between the two treatment groups overall

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Treatments Required to Achieve Mild Asthma Score - Discharge CriteriaWithin emergency department visit time frame (no more than 12 hours)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Children's Medical Center

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath