Comparison of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus Jet Nebulizer in the Pediatric Asthma Patient
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Interventions
- Device: Jet NebulizerDevice: Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer
- Registration Number
- NCT02774941
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes related to the current practice of using a jet nebulizer (JN) with aerosol mask (AM) or mouthpiece (MP) versus a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with a valved-mask (VM) or MP in the treatment of acute moderate to severe asthma in Children's Medical Center Dallas Emergency Department (CMCED).
- Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes related to the current practice of using a jet nebulizer (JN) with aerosol mask (AM) or mouthpiece (MP) versus a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with a valved-mask (VM) or MP in the treatment of acute moderate to severe asthma in Children's Medical Center Dallas Emergency Department (CMCED). The investigators hypothesize that using the combination of a VMN and VM or MP will result in fewer hospital admissions and decrease length of stay in CMCED when compared to the current practice of using a JN and AM or MP.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 220
2 to 18 year old (up to 19th birthday) otherwise healthy children with primary diagnosis of acute moderate to severe exacerbation of asthma presenting to Children's Medical Center Emergency Department, Dallas
- Children < 2 years old
- Children with comorbid/complex medical conditions such as: congenital or acquired cardiovascular disease, cystic fibrosis, chronic lung disease (other than asthma), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, airway anomalies (e.g., tracheomalacia) or immunodeficiency syndromes.
- Patients with coexisting medical condition such as pneumonia
- Patients in impending respiratory failure as determined by treating physician
- Patients that have had oral corticosteroids within 24hrs of CMCED admission
- Patients that have had bronchodilator treatment within one hour of CMCED admission
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control Jet Nebulizer Standard single patient-use small volume JN (AirLife™ Sidestream® High-Efficiency Nebulizer, CareFusion, Yorba Linda, CA) Study Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer (Aerogen® Solo with Ultra adapter, Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Subjects Hospitalized Within emergency department visit time frame (no more than 12 hours) The primary outcome measure is rate of hospitalization between the two treatment groups overall
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Treatments Required to Achieve Mild Asthma Score - Discharge Criteria Within emergency department visit time frame (no more than 12 hours)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Children's Medical Center
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States