comparision between ultrasound guided anterior approch to posterior approach in lower limb surgeries
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: M959- Acquired deformity of musculoskeletal system, unspecifiedHealth Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/10/046631
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of anesthesiology Shri B M Patil Medical college and hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All consenting patients planned for lower limb surgeries.
Age 20-80 years.
ASA grade I,II&III.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients refusal.
Patients with neuromuscular disease.
Patients with hemostatic abnormalities or on anticoagulation.
Patients with skin infection at the site of needle insertion.
Patients with chronic pain syndromes or receiving chronic analgesic therapy.
Patients with reported history of allergy to amide local anaesthetic drugs.
Patients with BMI >30.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method posterior approach is easy to perform and provide better visualization of the sciatic nerve when compared to the anterior approachTimepoint: baseline <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Post operative pain relief is more in posterior approach than anterior approachTimepoint: baseline,30 minutes,1 hour,2 hours,4 hours and 6 hours