MedPath

Comparison of Efficacy Dimenhydrinate and Metoclopramide in the Treatment of Nausea Due to Vertigo

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Vomiting
Nausea
Vertigo
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02253524
Lead Sponsor
Pamukkale University
Brief Summary

* Vertigo complaint is one of the common cause of patients who applied to emergency services.

* Patients who have applied to emergency services with vertigo complaint mostly have nausea as an additionally symptom to this complaint and anti-emetic agents can be used in their treatments very often.

* The investigators purpose is to investigate the advantages of Dimenhydrinate and metoclopramide to each other in the treatment of vertigo and the vertigo accompanied by nausea

Detailed Description

* Vertigo describes the illusion of being subject to an involuntary movement, usually rotational, of the patient or the patient's surroundings which is caused by sudden tonic neural activity.

* The management and episodic treatment of patients with spontaneous vertigo related nausea-vomiting symptoms are somewhat controversial in the emergency department setting.

* Patients admitted to the emergency department with complaints of vertigo in addition to a large portion of the symptoms are accompanied by nausea and antiemetic agents are frequently used in the treatment.

* An ideal treatment should be rapid in onset and effective, and lack debilitating side effects.

* Although a wide variety of classes of pharmacologic agents and modalities are used, the emergency department treatment of acute spontaneous vertigo and associated with nausea- vomiting has not been well studied.

* It has been reported that the most commonly used medications for parenteral treatment of vertigo and nausea-vomiting in emergency department are dimenhydrinate (DMT) and metoclopramide (MTP).

* It has a depressant action on hyper-stimulated labyrinthine function and antiemetic effects, believed to be due to the antihistamine.

* Dimenhydrinate inhibits vomiting by affecting the histaminic receptor and cholinergic receptor function center of vestibular nucleus in the central vestibular system.

* Dimenhydrinate reduces the symptoms of vertigo with depressant effects on the labyrinth function by this means.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • between 18 to 65 years old patients,
  • had vertigo and accompanied nausea or vomiting [VAS (visual analog scale) score >5] during their emergency department episode of care for which the attending physician recommended intravenous antiemetic medication.
Exclusion Criteria
  • abnormal vital signs,
  • women who were pregnant or lactation,
  • those with a history of epilepsy,
  • acute psychiatric symptoms,
  • organic brain disease,
  • parkinson's disease or phaeochromocytoma,
  • or any known allergy to the study drugs,
  • uncooperative individuals,
  • use of any antiemetic drug in the previous 8 hours or previous delivery of intravenous fluids during the emergency department episode of care,
  • currently undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy,
  • mechanical obstruction or perforation,
  • gastrointestinal bleeding,
  • inability to understand study explanation or outcome measures (any reason),
  • known allergy or previous adverse reaction to metoclopramide or dimenhydrinate,
  • and patients who refused to participate study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
FACTORIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
DimenhydrinateDimenhydrinate50 mg Dimenhydrinate with 5 cc syringe in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes
MetoclopramideMetoclopramide10 mg Metoclopramide with 5 cc syringe in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
compare the effects of intravenous dimenhydrinate and metoclopramide in the treatment of nausea due to vertigo in emergency setting. (nausea and vertigo scores as measured by Visual Analogue Scale.)Change from Baseline in nausea and vertigo scores at 30 minutes.

- participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 30 minutes.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath