3D Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy. A Prospective Randomized Non-inferiority Study.
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Sponsor
- Tampere University Hospital
- Enrollment
- 155
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Urinary continence
- Status
- Terminated
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
A randomized, prospective study to compare the direct and indirect costs, functional and oncologic results of 3D laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy procedures.
Detailed Description
The direct and indirect costs, functional and oncologic results of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) are compared to those of 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The hypothesis of the study is that the functional and oncologic results of the two operative methods are equal, but the direct costs of RAPL are significantly higher. A randomized, prospective non-inferiority study will will enroll 280 patients randomized 1:1 to both operative approaches to test this hypothesis. The primary functional outcome measure is the proportion of patients with complete urinary continence (no protective pad use) at 12 months post operatively. Secondary functional outcome measure is the preservation erectile function at 12 months post operatively. Oncologic outcome measures are the proportion of patients with undetectable post operative prostate specific antigen levels and positive surgical margins at pathological examination. The direct and indirect costs of both operative approaches are recorded.
Investigators
Antti Kaipia
Chief physician, department of urology
Tampere University Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy
- •Patient has to understand and be able to write and read Finnish language
- •No prior head injury, dementia or Parkinson's disease
- •No concomitant malignant illness
- •Life expectancy of at least 10 years
- •35-74 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
- •Locally advanced prostate cancer (T4)
- •Suspicion or documented metastases (M1)
- •Serum PSA \> 20 ng/ml
- •Prior laparoscopic hernia surgery employing non resorbable mesh
- •Prior pelvic irradiation or major surgery
- •Prior malignant disease within prior 5 years excluding skin cancer (non-melanoma).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Urinary continence
Time Frame: 12 months
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form (EPIC-26), urinary domain score is used to assess the return of continence post operatively. The percentage of patients with no protective pad use at 12 months post operatively is the main outcome measure.
Secondary Outcomes
- Prostate specific antigen(12 months)
- Evaluation of surgical margins at pathologic examination.(up to 12 months)
- Erectile function(12 months)