MedPath

Cost Efficacy Evaluation of Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Interventions
Procedure: Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
Procedure: Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Registration Number
NCT02784314
Lead Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Brief Summary

In this observational cost efficacy study, the investigator compare the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP). Every cost of care that include hospitalization related or post operative medical consumption are obtained and recorded up to 5 years follow up. Functional results (continence, potency, quality of life) are obtained through standardised questionnaires. Carcinologic results are estimated by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) relapse and salvage treatments. Economic evaluation will be made to estimate direct costs of the four postoperative year along with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per successful surgical treatment (preserved urinary continence and erectile function and PSA \< 0.2).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
25
Inclusion Criteria
  • Localized prostate cancer
  • Gleason grade ≤ 3 + 4
  • PSA < 15 ng / mL
  • Stage ≤ T2b
  • Eligible to receive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
  • Candidate bilateral or unilateral erectile preservation
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient at high risk of postoperative progression (PSA> 15 ng / mL; grade 5 predominant, clinical or radiological stage T3
  • Presenting erectile dysfunction (IIEF < 22)
  • Past history of urinary incontinence (> grade 1 WHO)
  • Body mass index > 30
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyLaparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyStandard laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
Robotic-Assisted Radical ProstatectomyRobotic-Assisted Radical ProstatectomyRobotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy using da Vinci Surgical System
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Erectile function12 months after surgery

Proportion of patients with recovery of erectile function between T0 (before surgery) and 12 months after surgery. Recovery is defined as a maximum decrease of 5 points score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) between pre and postoperative evaluations.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)Before surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 12 months (M12), 24 months (M24) and 60 months (M60) after surgery
ContinenceBefore surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 9 months (M9),12 months (M12), 24 months (M24) and 60 months (M60) after surgery

Continence is assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

TolerancePerioperative period, 6 months (M6), 12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24) afer surgery

Adverse events related to the perioperative prostatectomy, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months afer surgery

Quality of lifeBefore surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 9 months (M9),12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24) after surgery

Quality of life is assessed by EQ-5D, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25 scores

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio60 months afet surgery

Economic evaluation will be made to estimate direct costs of the five postoperative years along with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per successful surgical treatment

Surgical marginsDuring surgery

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Service d'Urologie et Chirurgie de la Transplantation - Hôpital Edouard Herriot -Hospices Civils de Lyon

🇫🇷

Lyon cedex 03, France

Service d'Urologie - Clinique St Augustin

🇫🇷

Bordeaux, France

Service d'Urologie - Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

🇫🇷

Paris, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath