Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02784314
NCT02784314
Completed
N/A

Medico-economic Evaluation of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Hospices Civils de Lyon3 sites in 1 country25 target enrollmentMay 2010
ConditionsProstate Cancer

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Enrollment
25
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Erectile function
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

In this observational cost efficacy study, the investigator compare the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP). Every cost of care that include hospitalization related or post operative medical consumption are obtained and recorded up to 5 years follow up. Functional results (continence, potency, quality of life) are obtained through standardised questionnaires. Carcinologic results are estimated by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) relapse and salvage treatments. Economic evaluation will be made to estimate direct costs of the four postoperative year along with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per successful surgical treatment (preserved urinary continence and erectile function and PSA < 0.2).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 2010
End Date
August 2016
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Male

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Localized prostate cancer
  • Gleason grade ≤ 3 + 4
  • PSA \< 15 ng / mL
  • Stage ≤ T2b
  • Eligible to receive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
  • Candidate bilateral or unilateral erectile preservation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient at high risk of postoperative progression (PSA\> 15 ng / mL; grade 5 predominant, clinical or radiological stage T3
  • Presenting erectile dysfunction (IIEF \< 22)
  • Past history of urinary incontinence (\> grade 1 WHO)
  • Body mass index \> 30

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Erectile function

Time Frame: 12 months after surgery

Proportion of patients with recovery of erectile function between T0 (before surgery) and 12 months after surgery. Recovery is defined as a maximum decrease of 5 points score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) between pre and postoperative evaluations.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Surgical margins(During surgery)
  • Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)(Before surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 12 months (M12), 24 months (M24) and 60 months (M60) after surgery)
  • Continence(Before surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 9 months (M9),12 months (M12), 24 months (M24) and 60 months (M60) after surgery)
  • Tolerance(Perioperative period, 6 months (M6), 12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24) afer surgery)
  • Quality of life(Before surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 9 months (M9),12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24) after surgery)
  • Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(60 months afet surgery)

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials