Cost Efficacy Evaluation of Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Interventions
- Procedure: Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyProcedure: Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
- Registration Number
- NCT02784314
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Brief Summary
In this observational cost efficacy study, the investigator compare the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP). Every cost of care that include hospitalization related or post operative medical consumption are obtained and recorded up to 5 years follow up. Functional results (continence, potency, quality of life) are obtained through standardised questionnaires. Carcinologic results are estimated by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) relapse and salvage treatments. Economic evaluation will be made to estimate direct costs of the four postoperative year along with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per successful surgical treatment (preserved urinary continence and erectile function and PSA \< 0.2).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 25
- Localized prostate cancer
- Gleason grade ≤ 3 + 4
- PSA < 15 ng / mL
- Stage ≤ T2b
- Eligible to receive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
- Candidate bilateral or unilateral erectile preservation
- Patient at high risk of postoperative progression (PSA> 15 ng / mL; grade 5 predominant, clinical or radiological stage T3
- Presenting erectile dysfunction (IIEF < 22)
- Past history of urinary incontinence (> grade 1 WHO)
- Body mass index > 30
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Standard laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy using da Vinci Surgical System
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Erectile function 12 months after surgery Proportion of patients with recovery of erectile function between T0 (before surgery) and 12 months after surgery. Recovery is defined as a maximum decrease of 5 points score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) between pre and postoperative evaluations.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Before surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 12 months (M12), 24 months (M24) and 60 months (M60) after surgery Continence Before surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 9 months (M9),12 months (M12), 24 months (M24) and 60 months (M60) after surgery Continence is assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Tolerance Perioperative period, 6 months (M6), 12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24) afer surgery Adverse events related to the perioperative prostatectomy, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months afer surgery
Quality of life Before surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 9 months (M9),12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24) after surgery Quality of life is assessed by EQ-5D, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25 scores
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio 60 months afet surgery Economic evaluation will be made to estimate direct costs of the five postoperative years along with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per successful surgical treatment
Surgical margins During surgery
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Service d'Urologie et Chirurgie de la Transplantation - Hôpital Edouard Herriot -Hospices Civils de Lyon
🇫🇷Lyon cedex 03, France
Service d'Urologie - Clinique St Augustin
🇫🇷Bordeaux, France
Service d'Urologie - Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
🇫🇷Paris, France