Economic Analysis of Robotic Rectal Resection in German Health Care System
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Interventions
- Other: Surgery
- Registration Number
- NCT06113796
- Lead Sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Brief Summary
Analysis of cost effectiveness of robotic rectal resection, either sphincter preserving or abdominoperineal extirpation, in the German diagnosis related groups (DRG) system.
- Detailed Description
Robotic surgery has many well-known benefits for patients and surgeons, while it comes with higher acquisition and maintenance costs. On the other hand, a higher proportion of minimally invasive procedures can save costs by reducing complications, decreasing hospital stays due to lower morbidity, and saving personnel.
To what extent can robotic surgery be cost-covering or even profitable, depending on the postoperative course? This question is investigated under the conditions of the German DRG system.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 65
- 18y
- histologically proven rectal cancer with curative therapeutic approach
- suitable for minimally-invasive surgery
- no rectal cancer
- primary open surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Robotic sphincter-preserving rectal resection Surgery Patients with robotic anterior or low anterior rectal resection and primary anastomosis for rectal cancer. Robotic abdominoperineal rectal resection Surgery Patients with robotic abdominoperineal rectal resection for rectal cancer.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Costs of treatment 1 year costs caused by the case
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Major Complication 30 days postoperatively Clavin Dindo Score ≥ 3
Length of Hospital Stay 3 months Hospital Stay after Surgery
30-days Readmission 30 days Readmission within 30 days after Surgery
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Hamburg Medical Institutions
🇩🇪Hamburg, Germany